Federal Awards · L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC · Award

THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPO…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
FA233024FB001
Contractor
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Department of the Air Force
Award amount
$746,282
Period of performance
Oct 31, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025
NAICS
334511 — Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
PSC
PSC 5841
Place of performance
VAN NUYS, CA, 914062029, USA
Competition
NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing
FIRM FIXED PRICE
Financial breakdown
Current value $746,282 · Obligated $746,282 · Potential value $746,282 · Latest action obligation $-10,385
Parent award
FA873023D0002

Public award description

THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPONENT TEAR DOWN AND EVALUATION AND SPARES PROCUREMENT. SEE CLIN DESCRIPTIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS.

Most recent · Modification P00009 · Aug 29, 2025 · $-10,385 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPONENT TEAR DOWN AND EVALUATION AND SPARES PROCUREMENT. SEE CLIN DESCRIPTIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. · FA233024FB001

Modification P00008 · Mar 24, 2025 · $0 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPONENT TEAR DOWN AND EVALUATION AND SPARES PROCUREMENT. SEE CLIN DESCRIPTIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. · FA233024FB001

Modification P00007 · Mar 19, 2025 · $0 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPONENT TEAR DOWN AND EVALUATION AND SPARES PROCUREMENT. SEE CLIN DESCRIPTIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. · FA233024FB001

Modification P00006 · Nov 4, 2024 · $0 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPONENT TEAR DOWN AND EVALUATION AND SPARES PROCUREMENT. SEE CLIN DESCRIPTIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. · FA233024FB001

Modification P00005 · Oct 16, 2024 · $0 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES (PAF): GCA COMPONENT TEAR DOWN AND EVALUATION AND SPARES PROCUREMENT. SEE CLIN DESCRIPTIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. · FA233024FB001

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same agency and NAICS · SPRWA126F0027 — Federal award — Department of Defense · NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP · Department of Defense · $10,645,230
  • Same agency and NAICS · N0010425FF100 — RUBBER TILES, NSN 5840 014645007 · MAST TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · Department of Defense · $5,778,060
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA282326F0113 — SAFRAN AIRBORNE DATA RECORDERS · SAFRAN DEFENSE & SPACE, INC. · Department of Defense · $3,913,121
  • Same agency and NAICS · H9224126FE013 — MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINMENT OF AN-ZSQ3 V1 AND V2 LIGHTWEIGHT, ELECTRO-OPTICAL INFRA-RED EOIR IMAGING SYSTEM… · TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC. · Department of Defense · $1,660,446
  • Same agency and NAICS · SPRTA125F0592 — Federal award — Department of Defense · THE BOEING COMPANY · Department of Defense · $215,736
  • Same agency and NAICS · SPRTA125F1882 — REPAIR OF DISPLAY UNIT IN SUPPORT OF THE KC46 AIRCRAFT. · THE BOEING COMPANY · Department of Defense · $168,412

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.