Federal Awards · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · Award

RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records linked to this contractor. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
FA807521F0027
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Department of the Air Force
Award amount
$36,428,986
Period of performance
Feb 24, 2021 – Feb 24, 2026
NAICS
541715 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Place of performance
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD, 210051780, USA
Competition
FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION · 4 offers
Pricing
COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Financial breakdown
Current value $36,428,986 · Obligated $32,765,781 · Potential value $36,428,986 · Latest action obligation $29,000 · Outlays $651,390
Parent award
FA807518D0006

Public award description

RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND (CCDC) COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS, CYBER, INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE (C5ISR)

Most recent · Modification P00067 · Sep 22, 2025 · $29,000 action obligation · RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND · FA807521F0027

Modification P00066 · May 15, 2025 · $370,801 action obligation · RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND · FA807521F0027

Modification P00065 · Mar 18, 2025 · $190,000 action obligation · RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND · FA807521F0027

Modification P00064 · Mar 6, 2025 · $190,000 action obligation · RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND · FA807521F0027

Modification P00063 · Dec 30, 2024 · $79,167 action obligation · RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND · FA807521F0027

Modification P00062 · Oct 30, 2024 · $686,400 action obligation · RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR INTEL TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURE FOR COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND · FA807521F0027

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same contractor · 47QFCA19F0006 — DEOBLIGATION, AND INCREMENTAL FUNDING MODIFICATION FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS… · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · General Services Administration · $926,187,467
  • Same contractor · FA807524F0060 — REQUIREMENT FOR ADVANCED PRODUCT INNOVATION AND DELIVERY FOR NAVALX. · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · Department of Defense · $805,762,801
  • Same contractor · FA875023F0080 — FULL-SPECTRUM INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE & RECONNAISSANCE (ISR), INNOVATION AND INTEGRATION-3 (F3I-3) · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · Department of Defense · $648,043,253
  • Same contractor · HS002123F0020 — TASK ORDER FOR BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION FIELDWORK SERVICES. · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · Department of Defense · $599,169,107
  • Same contractor · FA807522F0030 — DIGITAL ENGINEERING AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE NAVY DIGITAL INT… · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · Department of Defense · $557,826,681
  • Same contractor · FA807524F0042 — NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER ENGINEERING AND MODERNIZATION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS FOR NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE… · CACI, INC. - FEDERAL · Department of Defense · $313,904,376

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.