Federal Awards · ELB SERVICES LLC · Award

THE PURPOSE OF THIS PR IS INITIATE A TASK ORDER (SEQUENTIAL #02) AGAINST CONTRACT: FA8217-25-D-B004 TO SUPP…

Research this with AI

Ask AI researches this public topic. CaptureIQ qualifies the opportunity, manages the pursuit, and prepares review-ready materials.

Ready to pursue? Open in CaptureIQ.

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
FA821725FB044
Contractor
ELB SERVICES LLC
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Department of the Air Force
Award amount
$5,665,142
Period of performance
Apr 1, 2025 – Mar 31, 2026
NAICS
541513 — Computer Facilities Management Services
Place of performance
PHENIX CITY, AL, 368671573, USA
Competition
FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing
FIRM FIXED PRICE
Financial breakdown
Current value $5,665,142 · Obligated $5,665,142 · Potential value $5,665,142 · Latest action obligation $0
Parent award
FA821725DB004

Public award description

THE PURPOSE OF THIS PR IS INITIATE A TASK ORDER (SEQUENTIAL #02) AGAINST CONTRACT: FA8217-25-D-B004 TO SUPPORT SSF MISSION PLANNING REQUIREMENTS PER THE CLINS LISTED WITHIN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1 APR 25-31 DEC 25.

Most recent · Modification P00003 · Jun 25, 2026 · $0 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS PR IS INITIATE A TASK ORDER (SEQUENTIAL #02) AGAINST CONTRACT: FA8217-25-D-B004 TO SUPPORT SSF MISSION PLANNING REQUIREMENTS PER THE CLINS LISTED WITHIN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1 APR 25-31 DEC 25. · FA821725FB044

Modification P00002 · Sep 16, 2025 · $1,597,118 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS PR IS INITIATE A TASK ORDER (SEQUENTIAL #02) AGAINST CONTRACT: FA8217-25-D-B004 TO SUPPORT SSF MISSION PLANNING REQUIREMENTS PER THE CLINS LISTED WITHIN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1 APR 25-31 DEC 25. · FA821725FB044

Modification P00001 · May 7, 2025 · $0 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS PR IS INITIATE A TASK ORDER (SEQUENTIAL #02) AGAINST CONTRACT: FA8217-25-D-B004 TO SUPPORT SSF MISSION PLANNING REQUIREMENTS PER THE CLINS LISTED WITHIN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1 APR 25-31 DEC 25. · FA821725FB044

Modification 0 · Feb 27, 2025 · $4,068,024 action obligation · THE PURPOSE OF THIS PR IS INITIATE A TASK ORDER (SEQUENTIAL #02) AGAINST CONTRACT: FA8217-25-D-B004 TO SUPPORT SSF MISSION PLANNING REQUIREMENTS PER THE CLINS LISTED WITHIN FOR THE PERIOD OF 1 APR 25-31 DEC 25. · FA821725FB044

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same agency and NAICS · HC102826F0196 — DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CYBER DEFENSE COMMAND (DCDC) SUPPORT · LEIDOS, INC. · Department of Defense · $28,773,428
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA703726F0017 — DIRECT SUPPORT OPERATOR (DSO)/TACTICAL SYSTEM OPERATOR (TSO) TRAINING · LEIDOS, INC. · Department of Defense · $10,520,813
  • Same agency and NAICS · W91RUS25FA015 — ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND ADMINISTRATIVE TELEPHONE SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES ICMS IV TASK ORDER · GSTEK, INC. · Department of Defense · $6,015,014
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA703726F0018 — AIR FORCE TRAINING/CRYPTOLOGIC LANGUAGE PROGRAM MANAGERS (CLPMS) AND LANGUAGE TRAINING · LEIDOS, INC. · Department of Defense · $5,031,645
  • Same agency and NAICS · W912DY25F0375 — MCICOM I-COMM SERVICES TASK ORDER 2 · COHO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC · Department of Defense · $2,841,747
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA821726FB096 — THE MISSION PLANNING SUPPORT CONTRACT (MPSC) ENSURES SUSTAINMENT INFRASTRUCTURE IS ESTABLISHED TO SUPPORT A… · ELB SERVICES LLC · Department of Defense · $2,536,787

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.