Federal Awards · LODIGE USA INC · Award

THIS PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE, DESIGN, FABRICATION, INSTALLATION, ORIENTATI…

Research this with AI

Research smarter with AI

Analyze opportunities and compare insights across leading AI models.

Department of Defense · LODIGE USA INC

Ask AI researches this public topic. CaptureIQ qualifies the opportunity, manages the pursuit, and prepares review-ready materials.

Ready to pursue? Open in CaptureIQ.

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
FA860424CB015
Contractor
LODIGE USA INC
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Department of the Air Force
Award amount
$2,258,142
Period of performance
Jul 3, 2024 – Oct 31, 2025
NAICS
333922 — Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing
Place of performance
ESP
Competition
FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION · Set-aside: NO SET ASIDE USED. · 2 offers
Pricing
FIRM FIXED PRICE
Financial breakdown
Current value $2,258,142 · Obligated $2,258,142 · Potential value $2,258,142 · Latest action obligation $14,989

Public award description

THIS PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE, DESIGN, FABRICATION, INSTALLATION, ORIENTATION, AND TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR A CARGO HANDLING SYSTEM FOR THE 725TH AMS/TR, IN-TRANSIT MUNITIONS FACILITY, NAVAL STATION (NAVSTA) ROTA, SPAIN.

Most recent · Modification P00003 · Aug 28, 2025 · $14,989 action obligation · THIS PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE, DESIGN, FABRICATION, INSTALLATION, ORIENTATION, AND TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR A CARGO HANDLING SYSTEM FOR THE 725TH AMS/TR, IN-TRANSIT MUNITIONS FACILITY, NAVAL STATION (NAVSTA) ROTA, SPAIN. · FA860424CB015

Modification P00002 · Apr 28, 2025 · $0 action obligation · THIS PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE, DESIGN, FABRICATION, INSTALLATION, ORIENTATION, AND TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR A CARGO HANDLING SYSTEM FOR THE 725TH AMS/TR, IN-TRANSIT MUNITIONS FACILITY, NAVAL STATION (NAVSTA) ROTA, SPAIN. · FA860424CB015

Modification P00001 · Feb 19, 2025 · $0 action obligation · THIS PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE, DESIGN, FABRICATION, INSTALLATION, ORIENTATION, AND TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR A CARGO HANDLING SYSTEM FOR THE 725TH AMS/TR, IN-TRANSIT MUNITIONS FACILITY, NAVAL STATION (NAVSTA) ROTA, SPAIN. · FA860424CB015

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same agency and NAICS · SP330024F0611 — 8510901418!MATERIAL HANDLING CAPABILITY, · WERRES CORPORATION · Department of Defense · $53,164,329
  • Same agency and NAICS · W519TC25CA047 — OVERHEAD CONVEYOR MONORAIL SYSTEM FOR INERT PREPARATION OF BOMB BODIES FOR MCAAP. · TCB VETERAN, LLC · Department of Defense · $4,136,326
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA860425CB100 — NON-ACAT, MECHANIZED MATERIALS HANDLING SYSTEM, STORAGE AID SYSTEM AT KIRTLAND AFB, NEW MEXICO · U.S. MATERIALS HANDLING CORPORATION · Department of Defense · $2,218,000
  • Same agency and NAICS · SP330024F0098 — 8510343030!MATERIAL HANDLING CAPABILITY, · CONVEYOR HANDLING COMPANY, INC. · Department of Defense · $1,968,155
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA860425CB024 — NON-ACAT, MECHANIZED MATERIALS HANDLING SYSTEM, HIGH LINE DOCKS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS · WEBB-STILES COMPANY · Department of Defense · $1,534,298
  • Same agency and NAICS · FA860425CB107 — NON-ACAT, MECHANIZED MATERIALS HANDLING SYSTEM, MATERIALS HANDLING SYSTEM AT RAMSTEIN AIR FORCE BASE, GERMA… · WAREHOUSE ONE, INC · Department of Defense · $1,269,000

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.