Federal Awards · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · Award

THIS PILOT STUDY WILL ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY, INCREASE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS, AND OPERATIONALIZE RULES…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records linked to this contractor. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
HQ003425FE107
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Washington Headquarters Services
Award amount
$1,909,415
Period of performance
Apr 28, 2025 – Dec 2, 2026
Place of performance
COLLEGE PARK, MD, 207425100, USA
Competition
NOT COMPETED
Pricing
COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Financial breakdown
Current value $1,314,386 · Obligated $1,314,386 · Potential value $3,139,383 · Latest action obligation $1,314,386
Parent award
HQ003424D0003

Public award description

THIS PILOT STUDY WILL ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY, INCREASE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS, AND OPERATIONALIZE RULESETS WITH AI/ML THIS EFFORT WILL IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY ACROSS THE DOD BY OPTIMIZING INFORMATION SECURITY REVIEW AND RELEASE PROCESSES.

Most recent · Modification 0 · Jun 4, 2025 · $1,314,386 action obligation · THIS PILOT STUDY WILL ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY, INCREASE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS, AND OPERATIONALIZE RULESETS WITH AI/ML THIS EFFORT WILL IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY ACROSS THE DOD BY OPTIMIZING INFORMATION SECURITY REVIEW AND RELEASE PROCESSES. · HQ003425FE107

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same contractor · FA714625F0001 — SECURING EXPERIMENTAL QUANTUM COMPUTING USAGE IN RESEARCH ENVIRONMENTS (SEQCURE) QUANTUM COMPUTING ENVIRONM… · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · Department of Defense · $27,112,418
  • Same contractor · HR001126FE003 — QUANTUM BENCHMARKING INITIATIVE (QBI) EFFORT UNDER THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND (UMD) APPLIED RESEARCH LABORA… · Department of Defense · $8,696,382
  • Same contractor · HQ003426FE065 — DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENTS OF POTENTIAL FORCE PROTECTION THREATS FROM EMERGING ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHN… · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · Department of Defense · $5,418,016
  • Same contractor · HQ003425FE453 — CONDUCT RESEARCH RELEVANT TO THE USE OF OSINT AND PAI WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TOOLS AND LARGE LAN… · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · Department of Defense · $3,691,895
  • Same contractor · HQ003425FE160 — RESEARCH THE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND HEALTH OUTCOMES IN INDIVIDUALS AFFLICTED WITH SYMPTOMS OF EMERGING H… · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · Department of Defense · $3,341,309
  • Same contractor · HQ003425FE393 — PROVIDE ESSENTIAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES SUPPORTING GOVERNMENT INTELLIGENCE AND SE… · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · Department of Defense · $1,750,000

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Recompete monitoring

Awards approaching a documented period-of-performance end date. Related forecasts or opportunities are linked only when explicit references or strong deterministic signals match — expiration alone is not a confirmed recompete.

Period ends
Dec 2, 2026 (40 days)
Evidence status
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFIED
Evidence score
50 (deterministic, not pWin)
Opportunity evidence
Matched opportunity

Supporting evidence

  • FACT: Award period end date — 2026-12-02
  • FACT: Award start date — 2025-04-28
  • DERIVED: Days until period end — 40
  • FACT: Award recipient (incumbent on this award) — UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK
  • FACT: Awarding agency — Department of Defense
  • FACT: Award amount (obligated/total as stored) — 1909415

Analyze in CaptureIQ (tenant recompete watch uses your workspace data separately).

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.