Federal Awards · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Award

ANCILLARY SERVICES, SONOGRAPHERS FOR NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO

Research this with AI

Research smarter with AI

Analyze opportunities and compare insights across leading AI models.

Department of Defense · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD

Ask AI researches this public topic. CaptureIQ qualifies the opportunity, manages the pursuit, and prepares review-ready materials.

Ready to pursue? Open in CaptureIQ.

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records linked to this contractor. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
HT941024F0064
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Defense Health Agency
Award amount
$12,761,246
Period of performance
Mar 1, 2024 – Feb 28, 2026
NAICS
622110 — General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
Place of performance
SAN DIEGO, CA, 921347104, USA
Competition
FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES · 13 offers
Pricing
FIRM FIXED PRICE
Financial breakdown
Current value $12,761,246 · Obligated $10,443,066 · Potential value $13,504,345 · Latest action obligation $78,755
Parent award
HT005018D0018

Public award description

Limited purpose

ANCILLARY SERVICES, SONOGRAPHERS FOR NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO

Most recent · Modification P00012 · Sep 25, 2025 · $78,755 action obligation · ANCILLARY SERVICES, SONOGRAPHERS FOR NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO · HT941024F0064

Modification P00011 · Sep 23, 2025 · $-476,501 action obligation · ANCILLARY SERVICES, SONOGRAPHERS FOR NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO · HT941024F0064

Modification P00010 · Jul 5, 2025 · $162,520 action obligation · ANCILLARY SERVICES, MEDICAL Q-CODED SERVICES TASK ORDER, FOR NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO · HT941024F0064

Modification P00009 · Jun 3, 2025 · $3,603,804 action obligation · MULTIPLE MEDICAL Q-CODED SERVICES (MQS) ANCILLARY LABOR CATEGORIES FOR MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS AND DIRECTORATES AT NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO · HT941024F0064

Modification P00008 · May 13, 2025 · $0 action obligation · MEDICAL- MANAGED HEALTHCARE · HT941024F0064

Modification P00007 · Apr 29, 2025 · $124,009 action obligation · PHLEBOTOMIST · HT941024F0064

Modification P00006 · Feb 28, 2025 · $2,377,410 action obligation · MEDICAL- MANAGED HEALTHCARE · HT941024F0064

Modification P00005 · Feb 27, 2025 · $-1,980,754 action obligation · 13 PHLEBOTOMISTS, CORE LAB · HT941024F0064

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same contractor · HT001424F0013 — Federal award — Department of Defense · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Department of Defense · $123,546,473
  • Same contractor · HT941024F0172 — ANCILLARY SERVICES FOR 181 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT-NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN D… · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Department of Defense · $38,718,667
  • Same contractor · HT001422F0078 — DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCYMEDICAL Q-CODED SERVICES (MQS) · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Department of Defense · $15,864,074
  • Same contractor · W81K0025FA181 — CERTIFIED NURSING ASSISTANT (CNA) SERVICES AT BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER (BAMC), JBSA FORT SAM HOUSTON, TX · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Department of Defense · $13,687,882
  • Same contractor · FA300223F0170 — MEDICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR HIGH-RISK EVENT COVERAGE, MEDICAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, AND ACUTE TRIAGE… · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Department of Defense · $10,869,013
  • Same contractor · HT940724F0063 — MEDICAL Q CODED SERVICES REGISTERED NURSES · DECYPHER TECHNOLOGIES LTD · Department of Defense · $10,365,213

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.