Federal Awards · Award

IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR WILL SEARCH AVAILABLE DATABASES AND WEBSITES AND SUMMARIZE PARK-SPECIFIC DATA R…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
INP14PD01996
Contractor
Sub-agency / office
National Park Service
Award amount
$0
Period of performance
Aug 15, 2014 – Jul 31, 2015
NAICS
541620 — Environmental Consulting Services
PSC
PSC R410
Place of performance
OR
Parent award
INP14PC00232

Public award description

IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR WILL SEARCH AVAILABLE DATABASES AND WEBSITES AND SUMMARIZE PARK-SPECIFIC DATA RELATED TO AIR POLLUTION EFFECTS FROM OZONE (VEGETATION INJURY), SULFUR DEPOSITION (SOIL AND WATER ACIDIFICATION), AND NITROGEN DEPOSITION (ACIDIFICATION AND NUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION TO SOILS, VEGETATION, AND WATERS) IN THE 10 PARKS LISTED ABOVE. IN THE RISK ASSESSMENTS AT HTTP://WWW.NATURE.NPS.GOV/AIR/PERMITS/ARIS/NETWORKS/INDEX.CFM, EACH PARK WAS ASSIGNED A RATING RANGING FROM LOW TO HIGH FOR RISK FROM AIR POLLUTANT STRESSORS. IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE APPLICABILITY OF THOSE RISK RATINGS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL COMPARE THE RISK RANKINGS TO DOCUMENTED ECOSYSTEM IMPACTS. FOR EXAMPLE, SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK IS RATED AT VERY HIGH RISK TO ACIDIFICATION FROM NITROGEN AND SULFUR DEPOSITION. THE CONTRACTOR WILL EXAMINE AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY INFORMATION TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER STREAMS AT SHENANDOAH HAVE BEEN, OR ARE LIKELY TO BE, ACIDIFIED. DATA WILL BE DISCUSSED IN A WRITTEN REPORT AND CONDITIONS OF RESOURCES (E.G., WATER AND SOIL QUALITY, VEGETATION HEALTH AND DIVERSITY) EVALUATED WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTS THRESHOLDS FOR THOSE RESOURCES (E.G., CRITICAL LOADS). CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT A DRAFT REPORT TO NPS FOR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR WILL ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS AND PROVIDE RECONCILIATION OF COMMENTS TO NPS, AND SUBMIT FINAL REPORT 16 WEEKS AFTER AWARD. DELIVERABLES DATABASE CONTAINING RESOURCE DATA RELEVANT TO AIR POLLUTION EFFECTS AT THE 10 PARKS (ACADIA, GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS, SHENANDOAH, GRAND TETON, VOYAGEURS, OLYMPIC, YOSEMITE, NORTH CASCADES, MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARKS, AND THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARKS); DATA SHOULD FOLLOW NPS GUIDELINES AT HTTP://SCIENCE.NATURE.NPS.GOV/IM/DATAMGMT/INDEX.CFM. DRAFT REPORT FOR NPS REVIEW SUMMARIZING RESULTS AND DISCUSSING RESULTS WITH RESPECT TO RESOURCE CONDITION (E.G., CRITICAL LOADS) AT THE 10 PARKS; RESULTS SHOULD BE SUMMARIZED IN APPROXIMATELY 4-6 PAGES FOR EACH PARK; FORMAT SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH NPS GUIDELINES AT HTTP://WWW.NATURE.NPS.GOV/PUBLICATIONS/NRPM/HINTS.CFM. FINAL REPORT INCORPORATING RECONCILED NPS COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS IN FORMAT CONSISTENT WITH NPS GUIDELINES AT HTTP://WWW.NATURE.NPS.GOV/PUBLICATIONS/NRPM/HINTS.CFM.

Source: USAspending.gov

Find out who's winning similar federal contracts

Discover comparable awards, related contractors, and agency purchasing history.

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. Click Gemini to copy the research question when your browser allows, or use Copy question.