Federal Awards · EPSILON SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS INC · Award

C460B_THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS TO RECONCILE THE LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION SCLIN 0304AB/AA IN…

Research this with AI

Ask AI researches this public topic. CaptureIQ qualifies the opportunity, manages the pursuit, and prepares review-ready materials.

Ready to pursue? Open in CaptureIQ.

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
N5523624F2007
Contractor
EPSILON SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS INC
Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Sub-agency / office
Department of the Navy
Award amount
$3,316,902
Period of performance
Jun 27, 2024 – Apr 4, 2025
NAICS
336611 — Ship Building and Repairing
Place of performance
SAN DIEGO, CA, 921368008, USA
Competition
FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES · 3 offers
Pricing
FIRM FIXED PRICE
Financial breakdown
Current value $3,316,902 · Obligated $3,316,902 · Potential value $3,316,902 · Latest action obligation $-397,600
Parent award
N0002422D4463

Public award description

C460B_THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS TO RECONCILE THE LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION SCLIN 0304AB/AA IN SUPPORT OF THE USS TRIPOLI (LHA-7) FY24 EM 0075 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT N00024-22-D-4463, DELIVERY ORDER N5523624F2007. SSSD-HM&E-24-0075.

Most recent · Modification A00005 · Sep 5, 2025 · $-397,600 action obligation · C460B_THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS TO RECONCILE THE LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION SCLIN 0304AB/AA IN SUPPORT OF THE USS TRIPOLI (LHA-7) FY24 EM 0075 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT N00024-22-D-4463, DELIVERY ORDER N5523624F2007. SSSD-HM&E-24-0075. · N5523624F2007

Modification A00004 · Mar 24, 2025 · $0 action obligation · C460B - USS TRIPOLI EM 0075 FOR WORK ITEM EXCEPTION EXTENSION TO 04/04/25. SSP: SSSD-HM&E-24-0075 · N5523624F2007

Modification A00003 · Feb 18, 2025 · $0 action obligation · C460B TO GRANT DELIVERY DATE EXTENSION OF WORK ITEM 514-20-001, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE GOVERNMENT, FOR THE USS TRIPOLI (LHA-7) FY24 EMERGENT AVAILABILITY FROM 10 JAN 2025 TO 21 MAR 2025. · N5523624F2007

Modification A00002 · Nov 27, 2024 · $442,066 action obligation · C460B, TO FULLY FUND AND INCORPORATE AN UPWARD OBLIGATION TO ACCOMPLISH AN ADDITIONAL PORT CONTROLLABLE PITCH PROPELLER (CPP) OIL SYSTEM FLUSH FOR THE USS TRIPOLI (LHA-7) FY24 EMERGENT AVAILABILITY (EM) 0075. SSSD-HM&E-24-007 · N5523624F2007

Source: USAspending.gov

Related intelligence

Related Federal Awards

  • Same agency and NAICS · N5005426FP003 — Federal award — Department of Defense · METRO MACHINE CORP. · Department of Defense · $44,443,077
  • Same agency and NAICS · N5005426FL021 — USS FT. LAUDERDALE (LPD-28) FY27 SRA · MARINE HYDRAULICS INTERNATIONAL, LLC · Department of Defense · $25,204,627
  • Same agency and NAICS · N0002425C2301 — PSA FOR HARVEY BARNUM JR. (DDG 124) · BAE SYSTEMS MARITIME SOLUTIONS NORFOLK INC. · Department of Defense · $24,361,392
  • Same agency and NAICS · N4523A26F0803 — PSNS AND IMF SHALL REQUIRE SERVICES AND MATERIALS FOR REPAIRING, REFURBISHING, AND ADJUSTING THE ADVANCED S… · CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORPORATION · Department of Defense · $2,625,771
  • Same agency and NAICS · N5005426F5023 — LIGHTWEIGHT MODULAR BERTHS USS IWO JIMA (LHD 7) · PACIFIC MARITIME INDUSTRIES CORP. · Department of Defense · $1,008,982
  • Same agency and NAICS · N5523626F5027 — C460A - INCORPORATE REPAIRS FROM THE ORIGINAL WORK SPECIFICATION PACKAGE FOR USS FITZGERALD (DDG-62). · NAVAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT INC · Department of Defense · $425,528

Browse federal awards · Browse contractors

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.