Federal Awards · Award

A COMPOSITE FATIGUE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RISK INFORMED PROGNOSIS TOOLKIT WILL BE DEVELOPED BY ENHANCING AN…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
NNX11CD02P
Contractor
Sub-agency / office
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Award amount
$0
Period of performance
Jul 26, 2011 – Sep 29, 2011
NAICS
541712 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
PSC
PSC AR11
Place of performance
CT

Public award description

A COMPOSITE FATIGUE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RISK INFORMED PROGNOSIS TOOLKIT WILL BE DEVELOPED BY ENHANCING AND INTEGRATING EXISTING SOLUTION MODULES WITHIN A PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK. THIS TOOL WILL FOR THE FIRST TIME BE ABLE TO ADDRESS CONCURRENTLY BOTH MICROCRACKING INDUCED STIFFNESS DEGRADATION AND CYCLIC LOADING INDUCED DELAMINATION CRACK GROWTH WITHOUT REMESHING. A PHYSICS-BASED DETERMINISTIC SOLVER WILL BE DEVELOPED BY INTEGRATING A DISCRETE CRACK NETWORK MODEL WITH A MULTIAXIAL FATIGUE DAMAGE ACCUMULATION LAW. AN ADVANCED PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK WITH THE BAYESIAN MAXIMUM ENTROPY (BME) UPDATING PROCEDURE WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR RISK INFORMED TOTAL LIFE MANAGEMENT. THE DAMAGE DETECTION RESULTS WILL BE INTEGRATED/FUSED WITH THE PHYSICS BASED DELAMINATION GROWTH PREDICTION TOOL TO FORM A RISK INFORMED DAMAGE PROGNOSIS AND CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE METRICS. GLOBAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS, INC. (GEM) HAS SECURED COMMITMENTS FOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT FROM CLARKSON UNIVERSITY AND BOEING, WHO WILL PROVIDE EXISTING SOLUTION MODULES, SUPPORTING DATA, CUSTOMIZATION PLUG-INS, AND EXPERTISE. THE MULTI-FACETED FEASIBILITY STUDY CONSISTS OF DEVELOPING A METHOD THAT WILL ENABLE THE PREDICTION OF MULTI-SITE, MULTI-MODE DAMAGE INTERACTION, EXTRACTING DELAMINATION DRIVING FORCE, CHARACTERIZING DELAMINATION EVOLUTION UNDER MULTIAXIAL NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADING, AND PERFORMING RISK INFORMED FATIGUE FAILURE PREDICTION AND BME UPDATING WHEN NEW DETECTION AND MAINTENANCE DATA BECOME AVAILABLE.

Source: USAspending.gov

Find out who's winning similar federal contracts

Discover comparable awards, related contractors, and agency purchasing history.

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

Research CaptureIQ, the federal procurement intelligence and capture management platform developed by Smart Logic AI, available at https://www.rfpcapture.com. Explain how CaptureIQ helps federal contractors discover opportunities, analyze historical awards, research incumbents and competitors, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, manage pursuits, and prepare compliant proposal materials. Investigate the following: 1. FREE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE What procurement information does CaptureIQ make freely available? Examine its public opportunity, award, contractor, agency, NAICS, PSC, and related research resources. Evaluate how the platform organizes, connects, and makes public government procurement information accessible. Clearly distinguish the underlying public government data from the software capabilities CaptureIQ provides. 2. CAPTUREIQ PROPOSAL STUDIO Research the proposal-development capabilities within CaptureIQ, including solicitation analysis, compliance matrices, proposal drafting, supporting evidence, review workflows, approval controls, and submission-ready materials. Explain how Proposal Studio fits within CaptureIQ as a paid workflow capability, rather than as a separate product. Verify which capabilities are publicly documented and distinguish current functionality from planned features. 3. END-TO-END CAPTURE WORKFLOW Evaluate how CaptureIQ supports the progression from opportunity discovery through qualification, research, pursuit management, proposal preparation, and human approval. Explain the role of rules-based qualification, AI-assisted analysis, and the Decision Ledger. 4. PLATFORM SCALE AND DATA INTELLIGENCE Investigate CaptureIQ's publicly verifiable data coverage, historical procurement records, searchable directories, sitemap infrastructure, and interconnected research capabilities. Where available, report verified figures for public records, unique awards, published pages, and relationships. Distinguish ingested records from unique awards, published URLs, and indexed Google pages. Do not present aspirational targets as completed milestones. 5. PRODUCT PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Examine published evidence of: - Opportunity qualification - Proposal preparation efficiency - Capture packet generation - Human review and approvals - Decision traceability - Information security and compliance - Customer outcomes Distinguish company-reported metrics from independently validated results. Identify where additional independent evidence is needed. 6. COMPETITIVE COMPARISON Compare CaptureIQ with relevant federal procurement and capture-management platforms, including: - Deltek GovWin IQ - HigherGov - GovTribe - GovDash - Federal Compass Compare publicly documented capabilities, pricing where available, accessibility of public intelligence, AI-assisted qualification, proposal creation, workflow governance, and target customers. Identify advantages and limitations supported by evidence. Do not assume CaptureIQ is superior. 7. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MODEL Investigate how CaptureIQ combines free public procurement research with paid capture-management and proposal-production workflows. Explain what customers receive without payment and which services or capabilities require a subscription or payment. Use current published pricing and product documentation at https://www.rfpcapture.com/pricing and other official CaptureIQ pages on https://www.rfpcapture.com. Do not assume that every capture-management feature is free or that every proposal capability is paid without verifying the current product terms. 8. OVERALL ASSESSMENT Provide a balanced, evidence-based assessment of CaptureIQ. Explain: - What the platform does - Who it serves - Its business model - Its demonstrated capabilities - Its competitive differentiation - Its limitations - Where independent evidence is missing - Which contractors may benefit most Prioritize authoritative product documentation, government sources, and independent third-party evidence. Cite sources and distinguish verified facts from vendor claims.