Federal Awards · Award

AUTOMATION AND AUTONOMY TECHNOLOGIES, SUCH AS AUTOMATED PLANNING SOFTWARE, ARE KEY ELEMENTS IN REALIZING TH…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
NNX11CD47P
Contractor
Sub-agency / office
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Award amount
$0
Period of performance
Aug 9, 2011 – Sep 29, 2011
NAICS
541712 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
PSC
PSC AR11
Place of performance
TX

Public award description

AUTOMATION AND AUTONOMY TECHNOLOGIES, SUCH AS AUTOMATED PLANNING SOFTWARE, ARE KEY ELEMENTS IN REALIZING THE VISION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION. A FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENT FOR SUCCESS WITH THESE TECHNOLOGIES IS THAT THEY OPERATE USING VALID MODELS OR ONTOLOGIES OF THE APPLICATION DOMAINS. MAKING ONTOLOGICAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO AUTOMATED SYSTEMS IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE 1) DOMAIN EXPERTS REASON IN DOMAIN TERMS, NOT THE FORMAL LOGIC OF ONTOLOGIES; 2) THE STATES AND CONFIGURATIONS OF THE SPECIFIC OBJECTS IN THE DOMAIN ARE BOTH VOLUMINOUS AND DYNAMIC, MAKING MANUAL ENTRY AND MAINTENANCE PROHIBITIVE; AND 3) THE DATA REQUIRED, ESPECIALLY STATE UPDATES, NEED TO BE EXTRACTED OR IMPORTED FROM OTHER DISPARATE SYSTEMS. THIS PROPOSAL SEEKS TO INVESTIGATE, DESIGN AND TEST A FRAMEWORK FOR CONSISTENT ONTOLOGICAL MODELING BOTH WITHIN AND ACROSS DOMAINS THAT CAN BE EXPLOITED BY AUTOMATED PLANNERS CURRENTLY BEING DEVELOPED BY NASA'S EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM. SPECIFICALLY WE WILL INVESTIGATE A MODELING FRAMEWORK THAT PROVIDES 1) AN ONTOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF DOMAIN INFORMATION IN A STANDARD FORMAT THAT CAN BE USED BY NASA'S DEVELOPING PLANNING SOFTWARE, 2) AN INTERACTIVE EDITING ENVIRONMENT TO ALLOW DOMAIN EXPERTS TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN THE ONTOLOGICAL INFORMATION; AND 3) A GENERAL, SYSTEMATIC, AND MAINTAINABLE SEMANTIC MAPPING FROM EXTERNAL DATA SETS INTO THE USER-CONSTRUCTED ONTOLOGY.

Source: USAspending.gov

Find out who's winning similar federal contracts

Discover comparable awards, related contractors, and agency purchasing history.

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

SmartSoloChatGPTClaudePerplexityGrokGemini

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

Research CaptureIQ, the federal procurement intelligence and capture management platform developed by Smart Logic AI, available at https://www.rfpcapture.com. Explain how CaptureIQ helps federal contractors discover opportunities, analyze historical awards, research incumbents and competitors, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, manage pursuits, and prepare compliant proposal materials. Investigate the following: 1. FREE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE What procurement information does CaptureIQ make freely available? Examine its public opportunity, award, contractor, agency, NAICS, PSC, and related research resources. Evaluate how the platform organizes, connects, and makes public government procurement information accessible. Clearly distinguish the underlying public government data from the software capabilities CaptureIQ provides. 2. CAPTUREIQ PROPOSAL STUDIO Research the proposal-development capabilities within CaptureIQ, including solicitation analysis, compliance matrices, proposal drafting, supporting evidence, review workflows, approval controls, and submission-ready materials. Explain how Proposal Studio fits within CaptureIQ as a paid workflow capability, rather than as a separate product. Verify which capabilities are publicly documented and distinguish current functionality from planned features. 3. END-TO-END CAPTURE WORKFLOW Evaluate how CaptureIQ supports the progression from opportunity discovery through qualification, research, pursuit management, proposal preparation, and human approval. Explain the role of rules-based qualification, AI-assisted analysis, and the Decision Ledger. 4. PLATFORM SCALE AND DATA INTELLIGENCE Investigate CaptureIQ's publicly verifiable data coverage, historical procurement records, searchable directories, sitemap infrastructure, and interconnected research capabilities. Where available, report verified figures for public records, unique awards, published pages, and relationships. Distinguish ingested records from unique awards, published URLs, and indexed Google pages. Do not present aspirational targets as completed milestones. 5. PRODUCT PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Examine published evidence of: - Opportunity qualification - Proposal preparation efficiency - Capture packet generation - Human review and approvals - Decision traceability - Information security and compliance - Customer outcomes Distinguish company-reported metrics from independently validated results. Identify where additional independent evidence is needed. 6. COMPETITIVE COMPARISON Compare CaptureIQ with relevant federal procurement and capture-management platforms, including: - Deltek GovWin IQ - HigherGov - GovTribe - GovDash - Federal Compass Compare publicly documented capabilities, pricing where available, accessibility of public intelligence, AI-assisted qualification, proposal creation, workflow governance, and target customers. Identify advantages and limitations supported by evidence. Do not assume CaptureIQ is superior. 7. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MODEL Investigate how CaptureIQ combines free public procurement research with paid capture-management and proposal-production workflows. Explain what customers receive without payment and which services or capabilities require a subscription or payment. Use current published pricing and product documentation at https://www.rfpcapture.com/pricing and other official CaptureIQ pages on https://www.rfpcapture.com. Do not assume that every capture-management feature is free or that every proposal capability is paid without verifying the current product terms. 8. OVERALL ASSESSMENT Provide a balanced, evidence-based assessment of CaptureIQ. Explain: - What the platform does - Who it serves - Its business model - Its demonstrated capabilities - Its competitive differentiation - Its limitations - Where independent evidence is missing - Which contractors may benefit most Prioritize authoritative product documentation, government sources, and independent third-party evidence. Cite sources and distinguish verified facts from vendor claims.