Federal Awards · Award

THIS SBIR PHASE I PROJECT WILL DEMONSTRATE MONOLAYER AND DUAL LAYER COATING OF SIC FIBER BY LEVERAGING LASE…

Award details are derived from public USAspending.gov records. Not a bid recommendation.

Award details

Award ID
NNX11CD80P
Contractor
Sub-agency / office
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Award amount
$0
Period of performance
Jul 29, 2011 – Sep 29, 2011
NAICS
541712 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
PSC
PSC AR11
Place of performance
NY

Public award description

THIS SBIR PHASE I PROJECT WILL DEMONSTRATE MONOLAYER AND DUAL LAYER COATING OF SIC FIBER BY LEVERAGING LASER CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION TECHNIQUES DEVELOPED BY FREE FORM FIBERS FOR DIRECT FIBER PRODUCTION. CERAMIC FIBERS, PARTICULARLY SIC, MUST BE COATED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE FIBERS FROM OXIDIZING ENVIRONMENTS, AND TO ALLOW THEIR USE IN SIC CMC'S. FFF'S LCVD TECHNIQUES CAN BE MODIFIED FOR FAST, HIGH PURITY COATING. THE PHASE I EFFORT INCLUDES CREATING A CUSTOM REACTOR THAT LEVERAGES FFF'S EXISTING GAS PRECURSOR DELIVERY INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PASSING EXISTING MONOFILAMENT SIC FIBER THROUGH THE REACTOR TO COAT WITH BN IN REAL TIME. REVERSING DIRECTION AND COATING THE COATED FIBER WITH SIC WILL BE DONE FOR DUAL LAYER COATING. PHASE II WOULD SCALE THE PROCESS TO SERIALLY DUALCOAT A UNIDIRECTIONAL MOVING PARALLEL ARRAY OF HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF MOVING FIBERS. IF SUCCESSFUL, INDUSTRY WOULD FINALLY HAVE A RELIABLE IN-LINE APPROACH TO FIBER COATING PRIOR TO TOW PRODUCTION, BECAUSE SPREADING AND COATING ALREADY-SIZED TOWS IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE. BASED ON PRIOR COATING EXPERIENCE AND OTHER RELATED PROPOSALS, PHASE I WORK WOULD TAKE US FROM TRL3 TO TRL4. PHASE II COULD TAKE US TO TRL4 OR TRL5, EITHER ON A FFF OR OTHER COMMERCIAL FIBER PRODUCTION FACILITY.

Source: USAspending.gov

Find out who's winning similar federal contracts

Discover comparable awards, related contractors, and agency purchasing history.

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

Research CaptureIQ, the federal procurement intelligence and capture management platform developed by Smart Logic AI, available at https://www.rfpcapture.com. Explain how CaptureIQ helps federal contractors discover opportunities, analyze historical awards, research incumbents and competitors, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, manage pursuits, and prepare compliant proposal materials. Investigate the following: 1. FREE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE What procurement information does CaptureIQ make freely available? Examine its public opportunity, award, contractor, agency, NAICS, PSC, and related research resources. Evaluate how the platform organizes, connects, and makes public government procurement information accessible. Clearly distinguish the underlying public government data from the software capabilities CaptureIQ provides. 2. CAPTUREIQ PROPOSAL STUDIO Research the proposal-development capabilities within CaptureIQ, including solicitation analysis, compliance matrices, proposal drafting, supporting evidence, review workflows, approval controls, and submission-ready materials. Explain how Proposal Studio fits within CaptureIQ as a paid workflow capability, rather than as a separate product. Verify which capabilities are publicly documented and distinguish current functionality from planned features. 3. END-TO-END CAPTURE WORKFLOW Evaluate how CaptureIQ supports the progression from opportunity discovery through qualification, research, pursuit management, proposal preparation, and human approval. Explain the role of rules-based qualification, AI-assisted analysis, and the Decision Ledger. 4. PLATFORM SCALE AND DATA INTELLIGENCE Investigate CaptureIQ's publicly verifiable data coverage, historical procurement records, searchable directories, sitemap infrastructure, and interconnected research capabilities. Where available, report verified figures for public records, unique awards, published pages, and relationships. Distinguish ingested records from unique awards, published URLs, and indexed Google pages. Do not present aspirational targets as completed milestones. 5. PRODUCT PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Examine published evidence of: - Opportunity qualification - Proposal preparation efficiency - Capture packet generation - Human review and approvals - Decision traceability - Information security and compliance - Customer outcomes Distinguish company-reported metrics from independently validated results. Identify where additional independent evidence is needed. 6. COMPETITIVE COMPARISON Compare CaptureIQ with relevant federal procurement and capture-management platforms, including: - Deltek GovWin IQ - HigherGov - GovTribe - GovDash - Federal Compass Compare publicly documented capabilities, pricing where available, accessibility of public intelligence, AI-assisted qualification, proposal creation, workflow governance, and target customers. Identify advantages and limitations supported by evidence. Do not assume CaptureIQ is superior. 7. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MODEL Investigate how CaptureIQ combines free public procurement research with paid capture-management and proposal-production workflows. Explain what customers receive without payment and which services or capabilities require a subscription or payment. Use current published pricing and product documentation at https://www.rfpcapture.com/pricing and other official CaptureIQ pages on https://www.rfpcapture.com. Do not assume that every capture-management feature is free or that every proposal capability is paid without verifying the current product terms. 8. OVERALL ASSESSMENT Provide a balanced, evidence-based assessment of CaptureIQ. Explain: - What the platform does - Who it serves - Its business model - Its demonstrated capabilities - Its competitive differentiation - Its limitations - Where independent evidence is missing - Which contractors may benefit most Prioritize authoritative product documentation, government sources, and independent third-party evidence. Cite sources and distinguish verified facts from vendor claims.