SAM.gov listing

6515--Excimer Laser

Veterans Affairs, Department Of.248-network Contract Office 8 (36c248)Combined Synopsis/SolicitationSolicitation 36C24826Q1018

Response deadline

Thu, Aug 6, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT
Analyze This Opportunity in CaptureIQ

Compare your company's capabilities against this federal opportunity using CaptureIQ.

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Qualify the fit, analyze competitors, identify teaming partners, and generate review-ready materials — all in CaptureIQ.

  • Federal capture workflow
  • Competitor & teaming intelligence
  • Proposal preparation

Opportunity details

NAICS
334510
Notice type
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
Set-aside
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)
Original posted
July 31, 2026
Last updated
October 18, 2026
Notice ID
11db2c6c1cb442879079693746da6fb1

Summary

Amendment Notice Purpose of the Amendment The amendment to this solicitation is issued to address the following questions. This section outlines the specific concerns raised and provides clarification or responses as needed to ensure transparency and understanding regarding the solicitation process. The solicitation includes VAAR 852.219-76 and requires an SDVOSB nonmanufacturer to supply the product of a domestic small-business manufacturer or processor unless an SBA Nonmanufacturer Rule waiver applies. Please confirm whether a class or individual Nonmanufacturer Rule waiver applies to this procurement. If no waiver applies, please confirm how an SDVOSB nonmanufacturer may comply when offering the specified Philips Neximer Laser System. The applicable NAICS code is hereby changed to 334510 (Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing). In accordance with the Small Business Administration's Nonmanufacturer Rule Class Waiver for NAICS 334510, SDVOSB offerors are permitted to furnish products manufactured by other than small business concerns. Q. The SF 1449 and quote instructions describe the requirement as brand name or equal, while the Statement of Need identifies the Philips LAS-100 Neximer Laser System as brand name. Please confirm whether equal products will be considered or whether this is a brand-name-only requirement. A. The solicitation is revised to correct language in the Statement of Need (SON). This is a brand-name only requirement. Q. The quote instructions state that the Limitations on Subcontracting document is located in Section C.4; however, the certification appears in Section C.7. Please confirm that offerors are required to complete, sign, and submit the certification in Section C.7. A. This solicitation is revised to correct the instructions to offerors. The LOS Certificate is in C.7, not C.4. Vendors are required to complete, sign and submit with their RFQ response. Q. The SF 1449 instructions direct offerors to complete Sections B.1, B.2, C.4, E.7, and E.9. The solicitation does not appear to contain Sections E.7 or E.9. Please confirm all sections, certifications, and fill-ins that must be completed and submitted with the quote. A. The Standard Form (SF)1449, B.1, B.2, and C.7 LOS Certification must be completed and submitted with the quote. Q. Section E.5 does not list specific evaluation factors. Please confirm the factors that will be considered during the comparative evaluation and the technical information offerors must provide to be considered for award. A. Evaluation Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. A price evaluation in accordance with RFO 12.203(c)(2) will be conducted. The Government will determine the total evaluated price by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

Read Full Official Summary

Amendment Notice Purpose of the Amendment The amendment to this solicitation is issued to address the following questions. This section outlines the specific concerns raised and provides clarification or responses as needed to ensure transparency and understanding regarding the solicitation process. The solicitation includes VAAR 852.219-76 and requires an SDVOSB nonmanufacturer to supply the product of a domestic small-business manufacturer or processor unless an SBA Nonmanufacturer Rule waiver applies. Please confirm whether a class or individual Nonmanufacturer Rule waiver applies to this procurement. If no waiver applies, please confirm how an SDVOSB nonmanufacturer may comply when offering the specified Philips Neximer Laser System. The applicable NAICS code is hereby changed to 334510 (Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing). In accordance with the Small Business Administration's Nonmanufacturer Rule Class Waiver for NAICS 334510, SDVOSB offerors are permitted to furnish products manufactured by other than small business concerns. Q. The SF 1449 and quote instructions describe the requirement as brand name or equal, while the Statement of Need identifies the Philips LAS-100 Neximer Laser System as brand name. Please confirm whether equal products will be considered or whether this is a brand-name-only requirement. A. The solicitation is revised to correct language in the Statement of Need (SON). This is a brand-name only requirement. Q. The quote instructions state that the Limitations on Subcontracting document is located in Section C.4; however, the certification appears in Section C.7. Please confirm that offerors are required to complete, sign, and submit the certification in Section C.7. A. This solicitation is revised to correct the instructions to offerors. The LOS Certificate is in C.7, not C.4. Vendors are required to complete, sign and submit with their RFQ response. Q. The SF 1449 instructions direct offerors to complete Sections B.1, B.2, C.4, E.7, and E.9. The solicitation does not appear to contain Sections E.7 or E.9. Please confirm all sections, certifications, and fill-ins that must be completed and submitted with the quote. A. The Standard Form (SF)1449, B.1, B.2, and C.7 LOS Certification must be completed and submitted with the quote. Q. Section E.5 does not list specific evaluation factors. Please confirm the factors that will be considered during the comparative evaluation and the technical information offerors must provide to be considered for award. A. Evaluation Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. A price evaluation in accordance with RFO 12.203(c)(2) will be conducted. The Government will determine the total evaluated price by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

Official SAM.gov Contract Opportunities file extract description for this notice. CaptureIQ does not generate or rewrite this text.

Related Federal Opportunities

Why this matters

  • This notice is a combined synopsis/solicitation.
  • The listed response deadline is Aug 6, 2026.
  • 4 related opportunities share this NAICS.

Related federal terms

  • SDVOSB — Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
  • NAICS — North American Industry Classification System
  • PSC — Product Service Code

Market context

4 Related OpportunitiesMatching opportunities on RFPCapture

Related intelligence

Research and capture tools

This notice carries an explicit small-business set-aside designation.

← All federal opportunities · Federal Opportunity Research

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.