SAM.gov listing

Enterprise Management & Control (EM&C) System Integrator Requirement

Department of Defense → Department of the Air Force → SPACE Systems Command → PEO Military Communication and Position Navigation TIMING → FA8807 MIL COMM and PNT Ssc/cgkSources SoughtSolicitation EMC2026-001

Response deadline

Fri, Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT
Analyze This Opportunity in CaptureIQ

Compare your company's capabilities against this federal opportunity using CaptureIQ.

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Qualify the fit, analyze competitors, identify teaming partners, and generate review-ready materials — all in CaptureIQ.

  • Federal capture workflow
  • Competitor & teaming intelligence
  • Proposal preparation

Opportunity details

NAICS
541512
Notice type
Sources Sought
Set-aside
No Set aside used
Original posted
September 18, 2026
Last updated
October 18, 2026
Notice ID
c66e445c26224bc3aa0e7b28b1e05d76

Summary

The United States Government (USG), Space Systems Command (SSC), and Tactical SATCOM Division (SSC/TX), in coordination with the Directorate of Contracting (SSC/CGK), is conducting market research to identify industry partners capable of performing System Integrator (SI) functions or activities in support of the Enterprise Management & Control (EM&C) program. The USG intends to solicit and negotiate a contract or agreement with the contractor that provides the most technically acceptable solution to the USG under the current Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) on the Platform One Solutions Marketplace (P1SM). If interested in pursuing this opportunity, please submit a video to P1SM no later than end of October 2026 to allow time for your submission to be assessed in accordance with the competitive procedures of P1SM. The anticipated period of performance for the resultant award will consist of a 12?month base period and four 12?month option periods. The SI is responsible for planning, executing, and validating integrations between the EM&C platform and external programs/data repositories, including the Joint Management Tool (JMT), Unified Data Library (UDL), EMS Beskar, Blitzar, Protected and Tactical Systems (PATS) Mission Management System, and external commercial/government off-the-shelf software (COTS/GOTS). The SI contractor will not author core application code or dictate enterprise reference architecture. Core application code is developed by designated Development Contractors (DEV), while the architectural roadmap and governance are established by System Engineering & Integration Contractors (SE&I). The SI operates as the technical integrator and operational execution engine thereby, driving Program Increment (PI) planning, deployment automation, release orchestration, and enterprise-level test and evaluation (T&E). The SI must remain strictly independent of core software developers to eliminate any Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI).

Read Full Official Summary

The United States Government (USG), Space Systems Command (SSC), and Tactical SATCOM Division (SSC/TX), in coordination with the Directorate of Contracting (SSC/CGK), is conducting market research to identify industry partners capable of performing System Integrator (SI) functions or activities in support of the Enterprise Management & Control (EM&C) program. The USG intends to solicit and negotiate a contract or agreement with the contractor that provides the most technically acceptable solution to the USG under the current Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) on the Platform One Solutions Marketplace (P1SM). If interested in pursuing this opportunity, please submit a video to P1SM no later than end of October 2026 to allow time for your submission to be assessed in accordance with the competitive procedures of P1SM. The anticipated period of performance for the resultant award will consist of a 12?month base period and four 12?month option periods. The SI is responsible for planning, executing, and validating integrations between the EM&C platform and external programs/data repositories, including the Joint Management Tool (JMT), Unified Data Library (UDL), EMS Beskar, Blitzar, Protected and Tactical Systems (PATS) Mission Management System, and external commercial/government off-the-shelf software (COTS/GOTS). The SI contractor will not author core application code or dictate enterprise reference architecture. Core application code is developed by designated Development Contractors (DEV), while the architectural roadmap and governance are established by System Engineering & Integration Contractors (SE&I). The SI operates as the technical integrator and operational execution engine thereby, driving Program Increment (PI) planning, deployment automation, release orchestration, and enterprise-level test and evaluation (T&E). The SI must remain strictly independent of core software developers to eliminate any Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI).

Official SAM.gov Contract Opportunities file extract description for this notice. CaptureIQ does not generate or rewrite this text.

Related Federal Opportunities

Why this matters

  • This notice is a sources sought.
  • The listed response deadline is Oct 2, 2026.
  • 3 related opportunities share this NAICS.

Related federal terms

  • RFI — Request for Information
  • NAICS — North American Industry Classification System
  • PSC — Product Service Code

Market context

4 Related OpportunitiesMatching opportunities on RFPCapture

Related intelligence

Research and capture tools

This notice uses an IT NAICS or PSC classification documented in RFPCapture research.

← All federal opportunities · Federal Opportunity Research

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.