SAM.gov listing

FY26 Q4 Baltimore Harbor and Channels Maintenance Dredging, Maryland Channels, Chesapeake Bay, MD

Department of Defense → Department of the Army → US Army Corps of Engineers → Engineer Division NORTH Atlantic → ENDIST Baltimore → W2SD ENDIST BaltimoreSources SoughtSolicitation W912DR26BA004

Response deadline

Fri, Apr 3, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT
Analyze This Opportunity in CaptureIQ

Compare your company's capabilities against this federal opportunity using CaptureIQ.

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Qualify the fit, analyze competitors, identify teaming partners, and generate review-ready materials — all in CaptureIQ.

  • Federal capture workflow
  • Competitor & teaming intelligence
  • Proposal preparation

Opportunity details

NAICS
237990
Notice type
Sources Sought
Original posted
March 19, 2026
Last updated
October 19, 2026
Notice ID
e64c105adfe64385adfb2c7aec8310d7

Summary

FY26 Q4 Baltimore Harbor and Channels Maintenance Dredging, Maryland Channels, Chesapeake Bay, MD - The dredging depth for all channels is 50 feet mean lower low water (ft MLLW) with an additional 1 ? 2 feet of allowable overdepth. Approximately 1,538,000 cy will be dredged from the Maryland approach channels (Craighill Entrance, Craighill Angle, Cutoff Angle, and Upper Range Channels) and placed at the Paul S. Sarbanes Ecosystems Restoration Project at Poplar Island. Approximately 700,000 cy will be dredged from Baltimore Harbor Channels (Brewerton Angle and Curtis Bay Channels) and placed at the Cox Creek Dredged Material Containment Facility. The work areas are within heavy commercial waterways supporting the Port of Baltimore. The equipment required for this work commonly consists of two 30 plus cubic yard clamshell dredges, one 24 ? 30-inch hydraulic unloader, six to eight large tugs, six to eight 2,500 ? 6,000 cubic yard material scows, a drag bar and barge, and appropriate attendant plant and pipeline.

Read Full Official Summary

FY26 Q4 Baltimore Harbor and Channels Maintenance Dredging, Maryland Channels, Chesapeake Bay, MD - The dredging depth for all channels is 50 feet mean lower low water (ft MLLW) with an additional 1 ? 2 feet of allowable overdepth. Approximately 1,538,000 cy will be dredged from the Maryland approach channels (Craighill Entrance, Craighill Angle, Cutoff Angle, and Upper Range Channels) and placed at the Paul S. Sarbanes Ecosystems Restoration Project at Poplar Island. Approximately 700,000 cy will be dredged from Baltimore Harbor Channels (Brewerton Angle and Curtis Bay Channels) and placed at the Cox Creek Dredged Material Containment Facility. The work areas are within heavy commercial waterways supporting the Port of Baltimore. The equipment required for this work commonly consists of two 30 plus cubic yard clamshell dredges, one 24 ? 30-inch hydraulic unloader, six to eight large tugs, six to eight 2,500 ? 6,000 cubic yard material scows, a drag bar and barge, and appropriate attendant plant and pipeline.

Official SAM.gov Contract Opportunities file extract description for this notice. CaptureIQ does not generate or rewrite this text.

Related Federal Opportunities

Why this matters

  • This notice is a sources sought.
  • The listed response deadline is Apr 3, 2026.
  • 4 related opportunities share this NAICS.

Related federal terms

  • RFI — Request for Information
  • NAICS — North American Industry Classification System
  • PSC — Product Service Code

Market context

4 Related OpportunitiesMatching opportunities on RFPCapture

Related intelligence

← All federal opportunities · Federal Opportunity Research

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.