SAM.gov listing

H399--OKC Elevator Test and Inspection (Semi Annual and Annual Service)

Veterans Affairs, Department of → Network Contract Office 19 (36c259)Combined Synopsis/SolicitationSolicitation 36C25926Q0882

Response deadline

Mon, Oct 19, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT

Product Service Code

PSC H399
Analyze This Opportunity in CaptureIQ

Compare your company's capabilities against this federal opportunity using CaptureIQ.

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Qualify the fit, analyze competitors, identify teaming partners, and generate review-ready materials — all in CaptureIQ.

  • Federal capture workflow
  • Competitor & teaming intelligence
  • Proposal preparation

Opportunity details

NAICS
541350
Notice type
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
Set-aside
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)
Original posted
October 8, 2026
Last updated
October 17, 2026
Notice ID
42754d3ce8d94f5ca0b7ac40841a4fb0

Summary

This amendment is to provide clarifications and corrections to previously combined synopsis amendment for RFQ 36C25926Q0882 0002 OKC Elevator Test and Inspection (Semi Annual and Annual Service) Amendment 0003 provides further clarification and corrections via the following changes: - Amendment 0002 added FAR clause CL-120 Supplemental Insurance Requirements. Since this is requirement is for the test and inspection of existing elevator equipment, The Performance Work Statement does not require asbestos removal, abatement, remediation, or intentional disturbance of asbestos-containing materials. Therefor the following language will be removed from the clause: The successful bidder must present to the Contracting Officer, prior to award, evidence of general liability insurance without any exclusionary clauses for asbestos that would void the general liability coverage. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

Read Full Official Summary

This amendment is to provide clarifications and corrections to previously combined synopsis amendment for RFQ 36C25926Q0882 0002 OKC Elevator Test and Inspection (Semi Annual and Annual Service) Amendment 0003 provides further clarification and corrections via the following changes: - Amendment 0002 added FAR clause CL-120 Supplemental Insurance Requirements. Since this is requirement is for the test and inspection of existing elevator equipment, The Performance Work Statement does not require asbestos removal, abatement, remediation, or intentional disturbance of asbestos-containing materials. Therefor the following language will be removed from the clause: The successful bidder must present to the Contracting Officer, prior to award, evidence of general liability insurance without any exclusionary clauses for asbestos that would void the general liability coverage. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

Official SAM.gov Contract Opportunities file extract description for this notice. CaptureIQ does not generate or rewrite this text.

Related Federal Opportunities

Why this matters

  • This notice is a combined synopsis/solicitation.
  • The listed response deadline is Oct 19, 2026.
  • 4 related opportunities share this NAICS.

Related federal terms

  • SDVOSB — Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
  • NAICS — North American Industry Classification System
  • PSC — Product Service Code

Market context

4 Related OpportunitiesMatching opportunities on RFPCapture

Related intelligence

Research and capture tools

This notice carries an explicit small-business set-aside designation.

← All federal opportunities · Federal Opportunity Research

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.