Federal Procurement Forecast

CBP IT Policy (CIP)

Department of Homeland Security

Forecast overview

Subagency
CBP/OIT/EDME
NAICS
541611
Estimated value
$2M to $5M
Set-aside
N/A
Place of performance
VA

This requirement is for professional services supporting the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Information and Technology (OIT) CBP IT Policy (CIP) team. The CIP is crucial for drafting, revising, and publishing IT Directives, ensuring enterprise-wide efficiency and compliance with federal mandates like FITARA, the Clinger-Cohen Act, and the Evidence-Based Policymaking Act. It centralizes and expedites IT directive management, aligning OIT's strategy with stakeholders, and providing critical oversight and support for policy creation and implementation. Acquisition Strategy: SB

Related federal terms

  • IDIQ — Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity
  • FFP — Firm-Fixed-Price
  • NAICS — North American Industry Classification System

Ready to assess this forecast?

See your fit, likely competitors, related awards, timing, teaming options, and recommended capture actions.

See your fit • likely competitors • related awards • timing • capture actions

Acquisition timeline

Pre-solicitation timing from agency forecast sources. Estimated dates are planning data, not confirmed solicitation schedules.

Source published
08/27/2026
Last verified on RFPCapture
2026-08-31
Estimated award
Q4 2026 (agency estimate)
Expected period of performance end
Q4 2026 (agency estimate)

Why watch this

  • This forecast is tied to an agency with active procurement in this NAICS.
  • Recent awards exist in this market.
  • Recompete context: Related award history found; treat as related public awards unless SAM.gov confirms a recompete.
  • Agency planning data cites an estimated value of $2M to $5M.

See Who Is Likely to Pursue This Forecast →

Market context

NAICS market
NAICS 541611
Active contractors in this market
5 with relevant federal experience
Recent comparable awards
8 from public USAspending records
Reported awardee
LMI CONSULTING, LLC
Agency spending trend
$126.7M · Declining

Contractors with relevant federal experience

Relevance is based on public federal activity, including award history, agency relationships, opportunities, NAICS, and PSC. Inclusion does not indicate bidding intent, incumbency, or that the contractor is pursuing this forecast.

  • CACI, INC. - FEDERAL
    • Repeated award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
    • Direct award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
  • CACI NSS, LLC
    • Repeated award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
    • Direct award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
  • ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC
    • Repeated award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
    • Direct award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
  • LEIDOS, INC.
    • Repeated award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
    • Direct award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
  • OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES, INCORPORATED
    • Repeated award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment
    • Direct award history with this agency plus NAICS alignment

Action links

Want to assess this forecast against your company?

Source

Source
DHS APFS Public Forecast Export
Source file
Public Forecast List Acquisition Planning Forecast System (1).csv
Official source
Agency forecast source
Last verified
2026-08-31

Agency-published contact: Michelle

Forecast research and capture tools

Compare this forecast with broader federal opportunity volume and mix.

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.