SBIR/STTR Research Award

Scaled Growth and Production of Mycelium Resin for Low Density Engineered Wood

Award identifier d9254c4a4202568ab6d00a10b24e3a3ce5ebc38e02687b06f8cdfdf5fcef6ee2Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$599,915

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Ecovative Design Llc
Proposal award date
2018-09-01
Contract end date
2020-08-31
UEI
YV71BZMVX1F6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
8.1

Research abstract

Traditional engineered wood products, ubiquitous in our lives, are a human health hazard due to the carcinogenic nature of the binders used and lack of economical alternatives. The potential of mycelium binders as an alternative has become a primary research focus for Ecovative. Through the Phase I portion of this grant, Ecovative has identified low density (160-480 kg/m^3) engineered wood products as the most attractive commercial entry point for mycelium binders for a variety of reasons. First, existing low density boards consume the greatest amount of toxic resins per kg of wood due to the inefficiencies of surface coated particle binders. Second, the mechanical specifications of these low density boards can be achieved by a mycelium board with no press step and therefore dramatically less energy in manufacturing. Lastly uncompressed mycelium bound boards supply the same mechanical specifications while using as little as half the mass of wood products due to the unique gap filling and binding ability of mycelium, which far exceeds what is possible with a surface coated adhesive system.These factors enable Ecovative to produce an engineered wood product which offers a unique combination of density and performance, detoxifying existing low density engineered wood products while opening new areas for competition with rigid foam sheets, and hollow-core multi-component constructions, each of which have their own shortfalls. Additionally, the mycelium composite offers unique flame resistance, acoustic damping, and thermal insulation properties which further expand the possible applications for an engineered wood product far beyond the markets that can be reached with today's thermally compressed surface coated resin technologies.While the potential product pipeline which has been identified through Phase I work is broad, Ecovative has identified a narrow scope of higher margin smaller markets (<1MM ft^2 per year) to serve as beachheads for adoption. This work plan outlines a course of action both for direct sales to early adopters and to licensing for partner manufacturing within these markets. This work plan will set Ecovative on a long-term path to approach higher volume and higher impact markets as the usage of engineered wood products is redefined.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2018). Reported award amounts total $4,139,945. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.