SBIR/STTR Research Award

In-Situ Cryopreservation Without Cryoprotectants

Award identifier 86c73f1fae197bbd5b8a59697d52bec6fb79e1972431d55b133d80ecc7433e86Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$291,523

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CRYOCRATE LLC
Proposal award date
2018-08-03
Contract end date
2020-01-31
UEI
MXHXWLBMUZL7
Solicitation number
PA17-302
Topic code
100

Research abstract

SUMMARY With recent rapid advances in biomedical technologiesastronomical numbers of cell lines are emerging as highly valuable and promising products for therapies or critical research toolsThe ability to preserve stocks of quality controlled cells on both industrial and laboratory scales is an important challengedue to numerous technical and practical issues and regulatory concerns associated with traditional cryopreservation approach that requires the use of cryoprotectantsThe present proposal specifically addresses this challenge by developing of a novelin situcryopreservation technology that doesn t require the use of any cryoprotectantOur preliminary data demonstrated that efficacy of our novel ultra fast cooling approach to successful cryopreservation of partial corneal endothelia without using any cryoprotectantThe over goal of this proposal is consequently to produce and test the prototype of a device system that enables in situ cryopreservation of cell suspensions with the volumes sufficient for practices in both biomedical research and clinical applicationsHuman adipose derived mesenchymal stem cellshASCwill be used as the model for in vitro studies and the design and production of the device prototype will be optimized through an iterative bioengineering approachThis Phase I study paves the path for future engagement of the proposed methodPhase IIin enhancing the efficacy of using hASC and other valuable cell types for cell therapy and tissue engineering by potentially improving the quality of cell lots and minimizing donor to donor variability NARRATIVE Storage of cell lines with reliable quality and efficiency is of critical importance for biological research and biomedical applications meeting an ever increasing clinical needHowevertraditional cryopreservation approach using cryoprotectants incurs significant donor to donor variabilityregulatory concernsand complicated and inefficient proceduresTo overcome these challengesthe overall goal of the present proposal is to innovate cell cryopreservation technology by developing a novel method asin situcryopreservation of cell suspensions without using any cryoprotectant and with significantly improved performance efficiency and reliability

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2024). Reported award amounts total $9,178,721. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.