SBIR/STTR Research Award

In-Situ Fringe Pattern Profilometry for Feed-Forward Process Control

Award identifier af244daf9714c2ce4266fcb490c1b449be550ef82b91468184d71c2a09ada157Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$124,990

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ARCTOS Technology Solutions, LLC
Proposal award date
2018-07-27
Contract end date
2019-02-15
UEI
HX4BQCW632M9
Solicitation number
SBIR_18_P1
Topic code
Z3

Research abstract

This project aims to implement novel techniques for feedforward and feedback controlthat will allowbetter control, validation, and documentation of Selective Laser Melting (SLM) additive manufacturing (AM). Three complimentary key innovations will be realizedin this project (two in Phase I and a third in Phase II) by combining and improving two current technologies. The first is the integration of Fringe Pattern Projection Profilometry (FPPP) into the SLM process. FPPP is the first profilometry technique that can capture high resolution dimensional measurements of the entire SLM build platform, in situ and nearly instantaneously. This facilitates direct dimensional measurement and validation of every single layer, and post-process 3D models (built from the measurements) for the digital twin. By capturing all dimensional information (including residual stress induced distortion) the FPPP sensor willprovidea unique set of data for calibration of AM modelling software, which is the second key innovation.The FPPP data will identify defects in layer morphologies that can be used to train unique integrated computational adaptive additive manufacturing (iCAAM) feedforward modeling tools (distortion is predicted and compensated for with the build strategy before the build starts). In most simulators, the layer thickness is assumed to be constant and perfect, but it is not.FPPP data will quantify the true variability present in layer thickness as the part is built. Access to this information will allow more accurate calibrationofthe modelso final part distortion can be virtually eliminated. In Phase II the model will also be inverted and turned into a fast-feedback lookup table for further tuning the build process to compensate forsuboptimal layer morphologies that may arise, which is the third key innovation. The result will be a combination of hardware and software tools that eliminate distortion and capture critical information for the digital twin.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

25 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2020). Reported award amounts total $11,054,569. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Contractor profile

ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.