Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ
Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.
Award details
- Awarding agency
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Branch
- Not reported
- Recipient company
- FRONTIER ASTRONAUTICS LLC
- Proposal award date
- 2018-07-27
- Contract end date
- 2019-02-15
- UEI
- T8UAKZNE79H5
- Solicitation number
- SBIR_18_P1
- Topic code
- Z9
Research abstract
The concept describes abooster for a launch vehicle that is simpler to make, transport and launch than current launch vehicles.It is composed of two major components. The first being a booster structure and the second being a liquid rocket engine that uses a thermodynamic cycle that is a combination of two common cycles.Furthermore, the engine is actually fairly simple when compared to modern liquid rocket engines, thereby making it less expensive and having more inherently reliably. The booster uses hydrogen peroxide and kerosene. This is a dense propellant combination that allows the booster to be made out of relatively inexpensive materials yet still have a high propellant mass fraction. This reduces cost.The booster will use four fixed rocket engines (non-gimballing) that are angled slightly so that pitch, yaw and roll control can be achieved simply by throttling the engines differently. This eliminates the need for a gimbal mount, hydraulic actuators and related componets, flexible propellant feed lines and separate pressure tanks.Furthermore, with the use of dense, non-cryogenic, hypergolic propellants like hydrogen peroxide, all cryogenic compatible components (which are expensive), insulation and the entireignition system may be eliminated.The engine combines a gas generator with an electric pump fed design. It switches from one cycle to the other at the optimum time of flight allowing better performance than an engine using only one of the cycles exclusively.It would use the gas generator mode for liftoff and early in the flight as it can provide high power output at the cost of less specific impulse efficiency. By switching to a closed electric cycle doing boost the engine can then provide higher specific impulse with less thrust, which is acceptable because the booster will have consumed much of its propellant and is lighter.The combination of thisbooster and engine allows for a much simpler and reliable launch vehicle.
Technology keywords
Not reported
Other awards by this recipient
Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.
Research funding history
3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2020). Reported award amounts total $999,743. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.
Phases: Phase I, Phase II
Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Agency intelligence
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards