SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Dry Cooler for sCO2 Power Systems

Award identifier c127d963b07499a48d99281baec3b4f47ea5aeca24311aea5193dd13a4d0c923Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,993

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ALTEX TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2018-07-02
Contract end date
2019-04-01
UEI
LVHYQFMMY538
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001771
Topic code
30f

Research abstract

As a result of changes in regulations and permitting, the use of water for cooling in nuclear and other utility power plants is being constrained. Dry Coolers have larger footprints and costs, which burdens ratepayers, but achieves the objective of little to no water use. Due to of steam characteristics, Rankine steam cycle power plants have significant cost challenges, when converting to dry cooling. In contrast, the special characteristics of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton Cycles results in smaller, lighter and less costly dry coolers. However, costs must be further reduced, to take full advantage of the advanced cycle for nuclear and other power plants.An advanced air side heat exchanger fin has been defined that increases heat transfer by 170%, and reduces size and weight by 63%. This results in a dry cooler capital cost reduction of 46%, and total cost reduction of 48%, in a modular package that minimizes site erection costs, versus conventional dry coolers. These benefits are achieved by a special enhanced heat transfer fin that also has high efficiency, versus conventional fins.Under the proposed project, the special enhanced heat transfer fin will be adapted to the supercritical carbon dioxide cooler application. Available analysis tools will be used to design a full scale cooler system, for nuclear power systems of interest. Based on the full scale design, a subscale test article will be designed, fabricated and tested, using available test support equipment. The test data and analysis will then be used to update the full scale design, and evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the cooler concept. This will prepare the concept for development and testing, under a Phase II effort, to prove system performance and economic benefits, using prototype equipment. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The market for the concept is the same as the replacement market for all steam based Rankine power plants by supercritical carbon dioxide cycles that will have over 25 percent higher efficiency, smaller footprint, and be able to use dry cooling that will save many millions of gallons of water. The cooler concept alone can save $3 billion in capital cost for all power plants, relative to conventional filtration.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

117 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $33,304,403. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.