SBIR/STTR Research Award

CAD-Integrated Web-Based Building Performance Simulation Platform

Award identifier f91d3ee2b42e9deede9e87f576efd51e104d20304e0a812f20fb55aeb75bd117Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$143,044

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
LADYBUG TOOLS LLC
Proposal award date
2018-07-02
Contract end date
2019-04-01
UEI
DJLALLBL3NW7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001771
Topic code
09c

Research abstract

Today’s building energy modeling practice is highly fractured between different simulation engines, Computer Aided Design (CAD) interfaces, and web resources. While preferences for these fractured components vary between professions and individuals, one principle is nearly unanimously agreed upon: a strong, flexible connection between these three categories of software is needed if the building industry is to reach the full potential of building energy modeling. We will develop a web-based, cloud-integrated application that links existing popular 3D modeling environments to several validated simulation engines, including EnergyPlus/OpenStudio, Radiance, and OpenFOAM. This platform will provide new web-based workflows and will couple whole building energy simulation with daylight and detailed airflow simulation as specified in topic 9c for whole-building energy modeling. Phase I will involve developing core libraries for radiation, solar access, point-in-time daylight and annual daylight, the development of an Application Programming Interface (API) for this core, and setting up a secure server to host these services. Studies will be performed to identify critical inputs to be exposed in API and research into the most appropriate and economical cloud computing resources will be conducted. Following Phase I, resources for full-building energy modeling and computational fluid dynamics will be integrated. The fully-integrated API will not only allow these two types of simulations to tap into cloud computing resources but will also enable new types of studies that cannot be achieved with individual engines, including annual thermal comfort mapping, shade benefit analyses, and augmented heating/cooling system sizing. Not only do the full set of cloud services represent significant commercial value but the integrated, open source API and CAD plugins that are being produced to enable the services yield a substantial public benefit. Specifically, the CAD plugins will permit the running of free simulations locally on desktop computers and will enable many individuals to run simulations who might not otherwise be able to do so. Furthermore, the open source API will allow other software engineers to develop new applications that are not specifically related to cloud computing on top of the work of this project.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2021). Reported award amounts total $2,074,644. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.