SBIR/STTR Research Award

Continuously Wound High-temperature Superconducting Cable for the Central Solenoid of DEMO Fusion Reactor

Award identifier aaa63e24d5668bb85b9e1a0208b8712421661992c1788e8dbdbf7b1ce5bb4cf8Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,735

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
BROOKHAVEN TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC
Proposal award date
2018-07-02
Contract end date
2019-07-01
UEI
CRMXKBNGEWM8
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001771
Topic code
20a

Research abstract

Fusion reactors are a promising economic source of clean energy. In order to achieve the break-even operation, the future reactors, such as DEMO, will feature very high, > 16 Tesla, magnetic fields, which can be only created by magnet coils wound with the second generation (2G) superconducting wire. The 2G wires are currently manufactured as thin (1-2 micron) YBCO layer deposited on a metal substrate. The substrate takes a considerable portion of the cross-section, thus reducing the engineering current density, preventing effective inter-filament current sharing and transposition. The geometry is also responsible for high magnetization loss. Reducing the magnetization loss is especially critical for the central solenoid which operates under pulsed load. Brookhaven Technology Group proposes development of a new type of high-temperature superconducting cable for the central solenoid of a high-field fusion reactor. The product combines two recent innovations: (i) Reduction of AC loss by bundling narrow, 1-2 mm, exfoliated YBCO filaments into a transposed cable, (ii) continuous winding technology which eliminates labor-intensive and expensive handling of narrow filaments. The engineering critical current density of the wire will thus increase to over 2,000 A/mm^2, in 10 T, HIIc, 4.2 K; the projected cost of the filament is expected to remain below $20/KA*m, for the same operating conditions. The cable geometry enables x5 magnetization loss reduction compared to the state of the art 2G cables. Phase I activities will include the following tasks: (i) design and assembly of a continuous cabling system prototype. The system would allow for reel-to-reel manufacturing of a cable from a wide exfoliated tape; (ii) Manufacturing of a cable prototype of the spiral stack geometry; (iii) Low-temperature transport measurements and high field, 0.6 Tesla, measurement of magnetization loss. At the end of Phase I, BTG will characterize a 1 m coupon of superconducting cable comprised of four layers of the exfoliated filament. The cable will contain only copper, silver and pinning-enhanced YBCO. Low-temperature measurements will be carried out at National High Magnetic Field Laboratory and Wright Patterson Air Base. The Phase II goal is development of a scaled-up cabling system capable of producing > 1 km of the cable.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2024). Reported award amounts total $7,388,740. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.