SBIR/STTR Research Award

Design and Optimization of Clinical Gene Gun for Delivery of Nucleic Acid Vaccines

Award identifier 1195966234cd030acae9b5f92f4fc97df784bd035a249f77f589a36fa77fd8cbAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$598,613

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ORLANCE, INC
Proposal award date
2018-04-11
Contract end date
2020-06-30
UEI
KH6YJYH55G53
Solicitation number
PAR17-035
Topic code
NIAID

Research abstract

Gene gun delivery of DNA vaccinesalso known as particle mediated epidermal delivery or PMEDdelivers DNA vaccines coated ontomicron sized gold particles directly into cells of the epidermisIt achieves pain free deliveryis considerably more efficient than electroporation or other DNA vaccine delivery approachesrequiresfold lower dosesand induces both systemic and mucosal responsesThe gene gun stands out as the only DNA vaccine technology to date that has consistently induced T cell responses and protective levels of antibody inof vaccinated subjects in human clinical trialsIn additionin preclinical studiesthe research grade gene gun effectively induces mucosal responses that correlate with enhanced protection micenonhuman primates and swine models of influenzaHSV and HIV infectionsHoweverwhen transitioned into the clinicthe immunogenicity of PMED DNA vaccines in humans using a newly designed clinical gene gun resulted in lower immune responses than what was achieved with the research device in preclinical animal modelsOur preliminary studies show that these earlier clinical devices fell short of optimal engineeringIn particularthe first clinical gene guns delivered the particles into a smaller area and fewer particles penetrated the skin when compared to the research deviceThis is likely due to the use of a polystyrene nozzle in the clinical device that generated an electrostatic charge and restricted gold particle accelerationIn additionfor both the research and clinical devicesthe density distribution of the particles fell in a bell curve with the center of the target having a much higher density of particles and lower viability than the outer areaThis decreased viability of the cells in the center of the target caused reduced DNA vaccine expression due to a andquot dead centerandquotAnother obstacle to more robust vaccine expression in the use of DNA coated particles is that DNA must enter the nucleuswhile the majority of delivered particles now reach only the cytoplasm and fall short of the nucleusHerewe propose to address these limitations by incorporating novel engineering modifications to the research and clinical gene gunsaspinnerapparatus that will increase the target size and particle distribution and a hybrid aluminum plastic disposable clinical gene gun barrel to reduce electrostatic restriction of the gold particlesWe will alsoin collaboration with GE Global Researchinvestigate novel nucleic acid formulations for better nuclear localization and vaccine expression by employing a Rolling Circle AmplifiedRCADNA and stable RNA and RNA DNA compositions as strategies to increase the number of cells expressing the gene and the amount of protein expressed per cellWe hypothesize these modifications will result in generation of a newmore effective research and clinical gene guns with enhanced immunogenicity in vivo We propose to engineer two novel modifications into a needle free delivery device or gene gun and optimize RNA and DNA gold particle formulationsWe hypothesize these modifications will increase target sizecell viability and greater gene expression resulting in greater immunogenicity of nucleic acid vaccinesIf successfulthis work could overcome previous limits in DNA vaccine immunogenicity in humans

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2025). Reported award amounts total $14,888,527. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.