SBIR/STTR Research Award

Engineering carbon conserving microbes for production of industrial chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass-derived C5 sugars

Award identifier 5169fa81b3089c10f92c8fec10ed18c1e183a3a1494452601ee6db8eb1acc08dAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$225,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ZymoChem Inc
Proposal award date
2018-04-09
Contract end date
2019-04-08
UEI
FLNJKPXF1X95
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001770
Topic code
26l

Research abstract

The development of breakthrough biotechnologies for the production of fuels and chemicals along with commercializing bioprocesses that are cost-competitive with existing petroleum-based processes will be necessary to establish a sustainable bio-based economy- Two crucial biotechnologies to achieve this include processes that can utilize all forms of carbon available in lignocellulosic feedstocks and approaches that maximize the carbon efficiency of conversion processes- When microbes use bio-based feedstocks to make more reduced chemicals, deoxygenation most often occurs via the loss of ≥33% of the feedstock’s carbon in the form of carbon dioxide (CO2), limiting the maximum achievable theoretical yields to ≤67%- Given that feedstocks typically account for more than half of the total costs of a bioprocess, the carbon lost as CO2 generally precludes profitability for many bio-based endeavors- Additionally, such carbon-inefficient microbial approaches that exist today are tailored for using six-carbon (C6) sugars as feedstock carbon and typically suffer from poor utilization of other carbon sources such as five- carbon (C5) sugars (e-g-, D-xylose and L-arabinose), which constitute >33% of the sugars in lignocellulosic feedstocks – the most abundant inedible form of biomass- Utilization of these C5 sugars is critical to the economic viability of biorefineries that use sugars derived from lignocellulosic biomass for producing of fuels and chemicals- Although there has been remarkable progress in lignocellulosic-based ethanol production, there remains a need for the development of new metabolic platforms that expand the range of bioproducts that can be made via engineered microbes and using lignocellulosic C5 sugars,- To address these biotechnology needs, we have developed a carbon conserving (C2) biosynthetic pathway technology that can convert lignocellulosic C5 sugars (i-e-, pentoses) to a range of industrially desired C5 - difunctionalchemicals,specificallywithnolossofcarbonasCO2-OurnovelC2technology increases theoretical yields up to 50%, thus providing an opportunity to supplant state-of-the-art petroleum-based production methods, while also establishing the capability to use under-utilized lignocellulosic C5 sugars as feedstocks for chemicals production-

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2021). Reported award amounts total $5,480,351. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.