SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wireless embedded multi functional sensor system for in-situ health monitoring of refractory liners in fossil energy systems

Award identifier efc4245af7a2731522dee32b6c63156a69fa026b5514e7395eb0e93147e54afbAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$159,998

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SRS HOLDINGS LLC
Proposal award date
2018-04-09
Contract end date
2019-01-08
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001770
Topic code
19c

Research abstract

Coal is the most abundant fossil fuel in the United States and accounts for greater share of energy production- Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) is one of the promising technology used for the production electricity from fossil fuels- In an IGCC system, gasifier operates extreme high temperature (1375 - 1575 °C) and pressure (300- 1000 psi)- High chromium oxide (Cr2O3) refractory materials are used to protect the outer shell of the gasifier made of steel from extreme harsh environment- The molten slag interacts with the Cr2O3 refractory liner, causing refractory failure within 10 to 18 months by wear and corrosion- The replacement of refractory costs US$ 2,000,000 and three to four weeks of plant shutdown- Another major problem with IGCC system is the difficulty in measuring the operating temperature of gasifier- The currently used Pt-Pt/Rh thermocouples start malfunctioning within few weeks due to the corrosion caused by the molten slag penetrated through the access port- Accurate measurement of temperature is critical in a gasifier because high gasification temperature accelerates slag flow causing refractory wear and shortening of the life whereas low gasification temperature increase viscosity of slag and disrupt the flow resulting gasifier shutdown and economic losses- We propose to demonstrate through this project that temperature and degradation of Cr2O3 refractory in a gasifier can be monitored in-situ by embedding temperature and spallation sensors within the refractory bricks- Such capabilities are very useful for improving the efficiency of gasifier and planning the maintenance schedule well in advance to minimize the economic loss- This proposal seeks to achieve the following specific objectives: (1) Synthesis a broad composition range of inter-metallic silicide powder compositions of Mo(Si1- XAlX)2 and W(Si1-XAlX)2 by self-propagating high temperature synthesis (SHS) route and select the optimum composition based on characterization results, (2) pattern the temperature and spallation sensors using the optimum power composition on alumina substrate by tape casting and laser cut method, (3) laminate the sensors with functionally graded layers of Al2O3-Cr2O3 composites to prevent the reaction between sensors and Cr2O3 brick at high temperature, (4) fabricate a prototype by embedding the laminated sensors within high-chromia green brick, (5) interface the sensor output with wireless network to transmit the data to processing unit- In the second phase of this project heath of the refractories will be estimated by model based approach-

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.