Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ
Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.
Award details
- Awarding agency
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Branch
- National Institutes of Health
- Recipient company
- Sciome LLC
- Proposal award date
- 2017-09-30
- Contract end date
- 2018-05-31
- UEI
- TALRGESRV6C8
- Solicitation number
- PA16-302
- Topic code
- NIEHS
Research abstract
Project Summary
More than systematic reviews are performed each year in the fields of environmental health and evidence
based medicine with each review requiring on average between six months to one year of effort to complete
In order to remain accurate systematic reviews require regular updates after their initial publication with most
reviews out of date within five years In the screening phase of systematic review researchers use detailed
inclusion exclusion criteria to decide whether each article in a set of candidate citations is relevant to the research
question under consideration For each article considered a researcher reads the title and abstract and
evaluates its content with respect to the prespecified criteria A typical review may require screening thousands
or tens of thousands of articles in this manner Under the assumption that it takes a skilled reviewer
seconds on average to screen a single abstract dual screening a set of abstracts may require between
to hours of labor We have shown in previous work that automated machine learning methods for article
prioritization can reduce by more than the human effort required to screen articles for inclusion in a
systematic review Recently we have further extended these methods and packaged them into a web based
collaborative systematic review software application called SWIFT Active Screener
Active Screener has been used successfully to reduce the effort required to screen articles for systematic reviews
conducted at a variety of organizations including the National Institute of Environmental Health Science NIEHS
the United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA the United States Department of Agriculture USDA
The Endocrine Disruption Exchange TEDX and the Evidence Based Toxicology Collaboration EBTC These
early adopters have provided us with an abundance of useful data and user feedback and we have identified
several areas where we can continue to improve our methods and software Our goal for the current proposal is
to conduct additional research and development to make significant improvements to SWIFT Active Screener
including several innovations that will be necessary for commercial success The research we propose
encompasses three specific aims
Investigate several improvements to statistical algorithms used for article prioritization and recall estimation
We will explore promising avenues for further improving the performance of our existing algorithms and address
critical technical issues that limit the applicability of our current methods Aim Improved Statistical Models
Explore ways in which we can improve our models and methods to handle the scenario in which an existing
systematic review is updated with new data several years after its initial publication Aim New Methods for
Systematic Review Updates
Investigate several questions related to scaling the system to support hundreds to thousands of
simultaneous screeners Aim Software Engineering for Scalability Usability and Full Text Extraction Project Narrative
Systematic review is a formal process used widely in evidence based medicine and environmental health
research to identify assess and integrate the primary scientific literature with the goal of answering a specific
targeted question in pursuit of the current scientific consensus
By conducting research and development to build a web based collaborative systematic review software
application that uses machine learning to prioritize documents for screening we will make an important
contribution toward ongoing efforts to automate systematic review
These efforts will serve to make systematic reviews both more efficient to produce and less expensive to
maintain a result which will greatly accelerate the process by which scientific consensus is obtained in a variety
of medical and health related disciplines having great public significance
Technology keywords
Not reported
Other awards by this recipient
Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.
Awards with the same topic code
Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.
Research funding history
4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2023). Reported award amounts total $2,334,961. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.
Phases: Phase I, Phase II
Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services
Agency intelligence
Department of Health and Human Services
Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards