SBIR/STTR Research Award

SWIFT ActiveScreener research and development of an intelligent web based document screening system

Award identifier 0da550f54f158bec09143cf77697fa25b6e982436d9b98fcb6bbe57d5cce7764Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$211,900

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Sciome LLC
Proposal award date
2017-09-30
Contract end date
2018-05-31
UEI
TALRGESRV6C8
Solicitation number
PA16-302
Topic code
NIEHS

Research abstract

Project Summary More than systematic reviews are performed each year in the fields of environmental health and evidence based medicine with each review requiring on average between six months to one year of effort to complete In order to remain accurate systematic reviews require regular updates after their initial publication with most reviews out of date within five years In the screening phase of systematic review researchers use detailed inclusion exclusion criteria to decide whether each article in a set of candidate citations is relevant to the research question under consideration For each article considered a researcher reads the title and abstract and evaluates its content with respect to the prespecified criteria A typical review may require screening thousands or tens of thousands of articles in this manner Under the assumption that it takes a skilled reviewer seconds on average to screen a single abstract dual screening a set of abstracts may require between to hours of labor We have shown in previous work that automated machine learning methods for article prioritization can reduce by more than the human effort required to screen articles for inclusion in a systematic review Recently we have further extended these methods and packaged them into a web based collaborative systematic review software application called SWIFT Active Screener Active Screener has been used successfully to reduce the effort required to screen articles for systematic reviews conducted at a variety of organizations including the National Institute of Environmental Health Science NIEHS the United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA the United States Department of Agriculture USDA The Endocrine Disruption Exchange TEDX and the Evidence Based Toxicology Collaboration EBTC These early adopters have provided us with an abundance of useful data and user feedback and we have identified several areas where we can continue to improve our methods and software Our goal for the current proposal is to conduct additional research and development to make significant improvements to SWIFT Active Screener including several innovations that will be necessary for commercial success The research we propose encompasses three specific aims Investigate several improvements to statistical algorithms used for article prioritization and recall estimation We will explore promising avenues for further improving the performance of our existing algorithms and address critical technical issues that limit the applicability of our current methods Aim Improved Statistical Models Explore ways in which we can improve our models and methods to handle the scenario in which an existing systematic review is updated with new data several years after its initial publication Aim New Methods for Systematic Review Updates Investigate several questions related to scaling the system to support hundreds to thousands of simultaneous screeners Aim Software Engineering for Scalability Usability and Full Text Extraction Project Narrative Systematic review is a formal process used widely in evidence based medicine and environmental health research to identify assess and integrate the primary scientific literature with the goal of answering a specific targeted question in pursuit of the current scientific consensus By conducting research and development to build a web based collaborative systematic review software application that uses machine learning to prioritize documents for screening we will make an important contribution toward ongoing efforts to automate systematic review These efforts will serve to make systematic reviews both more efficient to produce and less expensive to maintain a result which will greatly accelerate the process by which scientific consensus is obtained in a variety of medical and health related disciplines having great public significance

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2023). Reported award amounts total $2,334,961. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.