SBIR/STTR Research Award

Modeling of Tire and Regolith Interaction for Surface Mobility Applications

Award identifier 29059043969d433136bedb52cc663429d08df09b596d90e3de637fd76dcd6781Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$149,958

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2025-09-16
Contract end date
2026-03-27
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
SBIR 2025-I
Topic code
H15

Research abstract

Exploration and eventual habitation of the surface of the Moon and Mars are highly dependent on our ability to safely and efficiently navigate the complex terrain and terramechanical response of the environment on vehicles and machinery. NASA has awarded contracts to develop new Lunar Terrain Vehicles (LTVs) to transport astronauts and essential equipment during future missions with required ranges of up to 5 km. Designing LTVs that sustain operation in this harsh environment is difficult, especially for LTV tires, which must be designed to operate in soil that behaves vastly different than terrestrial soils. Mimicking the Lunar/Martian environment and capturing the complex terramechanics of the soil and tire in experiments is limited, and designers must turn to computational approaches to study these interactions. Classical terramechanics models are useful to a degree but fail to properly capture behavior of compliant tires commonly used for LTVs. On the other hand, Lagrangian Discrete Element Methods (DEM) can capture per-particle regolith interaction with the tires with high accuracy but at significant computing cost thus limiting use for full-scale problems. CFD Research aims to address this modeling gap using a coupled DEM-informed Eulerian-Eulerian approach to simulate the regolith with DEM-based compliant tire models. Eulerian-Eulerian methods model a ‘granular’ volumetric fluid with constitutive models, thus significantly reducing the computational burden of having to track billions of particles required for DEM. DEM-tire models will use bond models to simulate compliant tires, which in turn is less expensive than traditional finite element approaches. The developed capability will be validated against experiments and verified against ‘Project Chrono ’ soil contact model and a DEM soil model. The resulting tools will facilitate performance analysis of a wheel-based (rigid and compliant) surface mobility system traversing a realistic compound slope condition.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.