SBIR/STTR Research Award

A new imaging based rapid in vivo toxicological screening method

Award identifier 44027e49e60805c3a489ab60631c1f88b85b0828374a1bb43fbadfb04d6f9cb4Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$217,130

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Theramix LLC
Proposal award date
2017-08-01
Contract end date
2019-01-31
UEI
NPYUSJHF5KS9
Solicitation number
PA16-302
Topic code
113

Research abstract

Abstract This proposal aims to introduce a new imaging approach for fast toxicological screening and toxicity evaluation Toxicity testing with animals has limitations with regards to cost time reliability and animal welfare However the most challenging situation is that thousands of chemicals can t be tested for safety assessment using existing testing methods Of the USEPA list of chemicals only of them have detailed safety data Together with another approximately new chemicals being introduced each year the tremendous number of chemicals with unknown safety information pose a potentially serious threat to public health In traditional animal testing adverse effects of chemicals can typically only be detected after the onset of adverse health effects disease or death in animals exposed to relatively high doses of the substance Our new imaging approach detects real time damage at the cellular level in the animals exposed to test substances Thus the adverse effects can be monitored at any time as long as cellular damage occurs It provides a rapid method for toxicological screening and it becomes possible to test substances at environmentally or biologically relevant concentrations Based on this imaging approach we can develop new methods for large scale chemical testing In this proposal we will first demonstrate the ability of the imaging system to detect and identify sites of toxicity produced by well establish toxic chemicals We will then explore the application of the imaging approach for acute toxicity testing Public Health Relevance The success of this proposal will demonstrate the utility of a new imaging method for rapidly detecting adverse effects that can be applied to toxicity testing strategies The new imaging based toxicity testing will allow continuous monitoring of real time damage with high sensitivity allowing testing of chemicals at concentrations close to the environmentally relevant exposure levels thus providing a more accurate prediction of human response It will also help to alleviate animal suffering during the tests by looking for effects soon after chemical exposure Most importantly this imaging approach would make it possible to develop methods to address the critical need for methods to test large numbers of chemicals

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2022). Reported award amounts total $693,873. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.