SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Air Coupled Ultrasonic Array Scanning System for In-Situ Monitoring and Feedback Control of Additive Manufacturing

Award identifier d15edf7651ea20d1011dba4fb65b534e8a544e3d9c70eb88bd04a7388d58764bAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$155,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
X-Wave Innovations, Inc.
Proposal award date
2017-06-12
Contract end date
2018-03-11
UEI
EDJ3MSJR9NK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001619
Topic code
18c

Research abstract

The majority of additive manufacturing (AM) processes are plagued by a lack of online process control. Most existing quality assurance methods involve an inspection of the finished part rather than online quality control, leaving a need for an online inspection system that can assist in the amelioration of flaws during the manufacturing process. Thus, a monitoring method to optimize the manufacturing process, increase part quality and reduce time/energy spent on post-process quality control/remanufacture is highly desirable. In this proposal, X-wave Innovations, Inc. (XII) and the University of Dayton Research Institute (UDRI) propose an Air Coupled Ultrasonic Array Scanning (ACUAS) system for in-situ monitoring and feedback control of AM processes. The end result of ACUAS is to provide high- resolution ultrasonic images of AM part properties which are subsequently used to augment the AM process control parameters (e.g. laser speed/power) resulting in the compensation of manufacturing defects. In Phase I, XII will prototype a system and demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed ACUAS technique for in-situ, measurement and feedback control of powder bed AM process. The focus of the Phase I program will be the overall ACUAS system design and prototyping, including design of the transducer array, signal/image processing algorithms, derived measurement of part properties, and feedback control strategies. The proposed ACUAS provides a means of measuring, and compensating defects formed in parts resulting from a powder bed AM process. The enabling technique will allow a fundamental understanding of the relationship between process parameters, and the formation of defects, as well as a means of ameliorating those defects so that they do not lead to failure of the finalized components. Thus, the proposed ACUAS system will have a significant impact on many industrial and military applications, as AM is being adopted rapidly in nearly all fields. Of particular interest to the DOE, would be the application of ACUAS in the AM of polycrystalline diamond compact drill bits for oil and gas exploration/extraction, or in the production of gas turbine fuel injectors.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

92 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2025). Reported award amounts total $30,524,673. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.