SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of a Compact Direct Air to Carbon Dioxide Heat Exchanger

Award identifier e9fdc5b4a1ecc761fcd835028102b0d65bd33bc98efb656bc3b532a0d2a91625Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ECHOGEN POWER SYSTEMS (DE), INC.
Proposal award date
2017-06-12
Contract end date
2018-06-11
UEI
QLY6WLN22PL3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001619
Topic code
29f

Research abstract

Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) power cycles offer breakthrough advantages in thermal to electric power conversion, including higher thermodynamic efficiency, lower capital, operation and maintenance cost and reduced system footprints when compared against both traditional and advanced steam Rankine cycles. The closed loop nature of these cycles requires heat rejection of low-grade heat. Historically, locally available water sources or cooling towers were the most common medium for heat rejection, as they represent a high capacity, low temperature heat sink that provides favorable thermodynamic performance. However economic and environmental concerns have limited the use of water cooling in new power plants. Because of this, air cooling can offer distinct advantages over water cooled systems. Current state-of-the-art technology for air cooled heat exchangers consist of two primary methods of construction, both circulating CO2 directly to several banks of fin-fan heat exchangers. These banks consist of multiple rows of finned tubes with air forced across the tube banks by electrically driven fans. The tube banks can be either flat or V-shaped. Because air has much lower density and heat capacity than water, these heat exchangers tend to take up a large amount of real estate and require large parasitic loads to operate the fans. Effective, small footprint, low-fan power air cooled heat exchangers have the potential to accelerate the adoption of sCO2 power cycles. In this program, Echogen will work with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to baseline performance and cost targets for advanced air cooled heat exchangers, provide conceptual designs based on the MHx technology developed by PNNL, design the test configuration and hardware required for air cooled heat exchanger evaluation and conduct testing on conventional air coolers to provide baseline performance data to be used in Phase II to evaluate a prototype MHx. This proposal presents a vital advancement to state-of-the-art sCO2 cycles via “dry cooling” using advanced air-cooled heat exchanger technology. This advancement will increase sCO2 cycle flexibility, minimizing impact on water usage and local ecosystems, and maximizing the potential for improving energy usage across numerous U.S. industry markets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2022). Reported award amounts total $779,953. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.