SBIR/STTR Research Award

CBB Repel: Safeguarding the Prosperity of the Small Farm Hawaiian Coffee Industry

Award identifier 992f389932dbb506318285d3a722e51d2aa1621b84c6df11f90b80623dee9a26Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ISCA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Proposal award date
2017-06-01
Contract end date
2018-01-31
UEI
K8UCJMA9VW39
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
8.12

Research abstract

This USDA/NIFA Phase I will focus on developing CBB Repel, a novel organic, semiochemical pest management tool to support the small coffee grower of Hawaii--and the globe--by offering protection for their crops against the devastation caused by CBB. By controlling coffee berry borer infestations, we will directly support small scale coffee farms which are often family owned and relied upon as the livelihood, not only in Hawaii, but also for 20 million families around the world. Providing alternative pest management strategies to farmers will ensure food security by increasing harvesting yields from coffee crops, providing the maximum amount of product available to be sold for profit and economic growth of the rural community. With the concerns of the effect of conventional chemical insecticides on the health and wellness of people and the environment, there has been a call to reduce insecticide usage. With ever stricter restrictions on allowable pesticide residue levels being placed on imported foods, our product would ensure food safety by reducing, if not eliminating, the frequency of use and amount of synthetic chemical insecticides sprayed directly on coffee, allowing small scale farmers to produce coffee without residues, and to continue to export their crop around the world. Subsequently, the rural communities in which these farmers live and produce their crop would see the economic benefits of increased exportation and consumption of their local products. The reduction in pesticide use would not only protect the health of the workers responsible to applying these control methods, but would reduce costs and time spent actively attempting to control pest insects. Additionally, the reduction of toxic pesticide use would benefit farmers in Hawaii as well as tropical coffee-producing countries, where protective measures against pesticides may not be desirable (e.g. too hot), or even possible, due to cost restrictions from buying protective gear and the increase in time required to spray. The ultimate beneficiary of this technology will be the consumer, by having coffee beans with no insecticide residuals, and of better quality (i.e., undamaged, with low incidence of pathogenic microorganism and related contaminants, like aflatoxins) and taste.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

80 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2023). Reported award amounts total $26,392,074. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Agriculture, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.