SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Scale Up Reactor for a Novel Quartz Based Methane Aromatization Catalyst

Award identifier 484ce12d31654c46e54b20bfcdf6aee3d48c2bf2ff7fb94afd57527ac7cf509dAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$154,871

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
Proposal award date
2017-02-21
Contract end date
2017-11-20
UEI
Z8KVZV3DR7J4
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001618
Topic code
17a

Research abstract

The United States chemical market relies on many petroleum based chemicals, such as ethylene, benzene, or toluene, as building blocks for other chemical products. Recently, the United States has put much effort into recovering the abundant amounts of shale gas. The Department of Energy is seeking novel catalytic processes to help produce from natural gas the same chemicals that historically have had a petroleum based feedstock. Engineers at Advanced Cooling Technologies propose to assist the University of Maryland in scaling up and commercializing their novel catalyst technology that is capable of converting shale gas into the aforementioned chemical building blocks. Currently in development at the University of Maryland, there is a novel quartz based catalyst that shows promising conversion of methane to high value products. It is a non-oxidative process that requires careful thermal management to maintain optimal reaction conditions. Advanced Cooling Technologies will provide an isothermal environment for the catalyst in an effort to scale up the sensitive process. In Phase I, we will begin with continued testing at University of Maryland’s facilities with a methane feedstock and bench scale reactors. At the same time, subcontractors at Environmental Standards Inc. will provide advanced modeling of the catalyst surface to help guide the research towards optimal reactor conditions. This will also help Advanced Cooling Technologies design an optimal scale up reactor for testing. Advanced Cooling Technologies will conduct testing in the scale up reactor with a methane feedstock by the end of phase I to prove the principle of the design. Advanced Cooling Technologies predicts that if we are successful in phase I at demonstrating the capability of our isothermal reactors, there will be high interested from existing energy companies in licensing our product. Phase II will allow us to produce larger reactors and test with natural gas feed. This will allow us to explore further optimization and test the full range of operation of the reactor.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

282 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2026). Reported award amounts total $118,415,811. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.