SBIR/STTR Research Award

FASPAX, Commercialization of Fast Area Detectors for Synchrotron light sources

Award identifier 45614c1f0726b2d2b8882eb9e616ed2de3dc21e86cbfae3e09b3a406868c78dbAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$229,905

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
FIELD VIEWERS INC
Proposal award date
2017-02-21
Contract end date
2017-11-20
UEI
FFLGE4DJKP93
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001618
Topic code
09a

Research abstract

FASPAX (Fermi-Argonne Semiconducting Pixel Array X-ray detector) is proposed as a fast integrating area detector prototype with wide dynamic range for time resolved applications at the upgraded Advanced Photon Source (APS). A burst mode detector with intended 13 MHz image rate, FASPAX also incorporates a novel integration circuit to achieve wide dynamic range, from single photon sensitivity to 105 x-rays/pixel/pulse. This detector will meet requirements necessitated by this beamline upgrade. Increased beam current, number of bunches, bunch spacing and the repetition rate requires a detector such as FASPAX to make full use of the beamline capability for material science research. There’s no commercially available product that can make use of such an enhanced beam. Field Viewers phase I proposal is to take the prototype developed at APS, and complete the R&D to create a full-fledged 15 cm x 15 cm wide area coverage camera. The phase I work is proposed as a 4 stage work plan and these stages are: Project initiation, Voice-of- customer, Development and project closure. At the end of project initiation stage, first milestone is planned in the form of a report that will summarize FASPAX capabilities. Stage 2 work consists of gathering voice of customer and beamline experimental R&D. Field Viewers will complete two milestones during this, staging for experiments and completion of experimental work. Stage 3 is the development stage, where Field Viewers will define the product architecture, conceptual design and detailed product requirement specifications, broken down into system, subsystem requirements , design specifications and risk management matrix. It is envisioned that the FASPAX product will have 5 subsystems: a) Sensor-ASIC, b) Digitizer, c) Data acquisition and control, d) Reconstruction platform and e) Graphical User Interface. The development phase will complete the system architecture, major design choices for the subsystems and ground work to embark on product development in phase II. Field Viewers PI, design infrastructure and research environment along with participation by Dr. Rebecca Bradford from Argonne National Lab creates the right mixture of talent and resources for successful completion of Phase I and subsequently Phase II projects.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2018). Reported award amounts total $329,492. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.