SBIR/STTR Research Award

Synchronized Multi-channel and Low Power Wireless Acoustic Emission Sensor Network for Radar Tower Structural Monitoring

Award identifier 2bb2fa28140dfbe1b7ed3823b39ca51b32e6929b2eb765932aeb066fd4e71b8dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Intelligent Automation, Inc.
Proposal award date
2016-09-28
Contract end date
2017-03-16
UEI
C3QJD7VXG167
Solicitation number
2016.1
Topic code
AF161-011

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Many of the radar sites throughout the world are over 50 years old and ongoing sustainment and inspections of these facilities is in critical need. We propose to develop and test a wireless, multi-channel and low power consumption Acoustic Emission (AE) sensor network system to monitor the steel and composite radar tower structures for fatigue and stress corrosion cracking. The proposed system leverages our extensive structural monitoring experience for steel highway bridges. The AE sensor system will be able to detect and discern damage sound from the environmental noise, and localize the damage site within a few inches with a sparse sensor network. Phase I will focus on developing and testing the feasibility of the AE sensor network for representative structures with cyclic fatigue tests in the lab, and field trials of the prototype device on a target radar tower; Phase II will further develop and improve the system and deploy the system on the radar tower for long term data collection in the operational environment. The end-product will also be ready to transition to real radar system applications for other civil infrastructures.; BENEFIT: AE-WSN has significant commercial potential for applications in both military and civil structure integrity monitoring and maintenance. Without knowledge of damage condition, radar tower in service need to be inspected based on a fixed schedule. Large safety factors are usually applied which significantly increases maintenance cost. On the other extreme, as some of the radar towers are located in extremely remote and desolate locations, inspections of those towers may be skipped over some extended period of time, leading to potential severe structural failures. The proposed tool provides accurate and reliable assessment of damage status and fatigue life. Condition-based maintenance can be performed, which greatly reduces costs and labors. Both government and commercial organizations will benefit from the development of AE-WSN system.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,182 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2021). Reported award amounts total $369,972,257. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.