SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: A Plug-and-Play Bioprinting Educational Toolkit for Next Generation Science and Engineering Students

Award identifier 1587255da3c2680e97aec99f47785198449dec972a0d3c28e78c8d1075d28efcAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$726,272

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SE3D, INC.
Proposal award date
2016-09-15
Contract end date
2018-08-31
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
EA

Research abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology is giving rise to new methods and innovation in multiple fields across the biomedical and biotechnological industries. On-going progress is generating growth in the bioprinting market creating demands for new job skills in the near future. To address industry needs, schools must ready themselves with the right tools and equipment to train next generation students. Moreover, increased accessibility of technology in education can help to empower students and expand their scientific creativity. However, current 3D bioprinting instrumentation are primarily designed for industry use and expensive. Technical barriers further prohibit many schools from gaining access. To truly democratize technology innovation for next generation scientists and engineers, a sustainable solution catered to the education market is necessary. This SBIR Phase II project is aimed at addressing this opportunity gap and will create an affordable 3D bioprinting equipment and educational toolkit catered to high schools and colleges. The proposed bioprinting equipment will be multi-functional so that teachers can use it for a variety of classroom applications. In addition, the educational toolkit will include student-friendly software tools facilitating experiments in 3D bioprinting, bioreagent kits, and curriculum to support teachers in using the bioprinters in the classroom. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project aims to create a highly functional and versatile bioprinting equipment and educational toolkit for the high school and college education market. The motivation behind this work is to increase accessibility of new and cutting-edge tools to next generation students who will not only benefit from gaining industry-relevant skills they need in the near future but provide them with the opportunity to innovate. The proposed multi-functional bioprinting equipment will facilitate increased hands-on learning activities in the classroom, a key component in learning science and practice engineering, and project-based learning. To this end, the development of curriculum to support use of the 3D bioprinter is critical in manifesting adoption in the classroom. From the hardware engineering perspective, the project will focus on engineering design to achieve integration of multiple functionalities in the proposed bioprinting equipment. Software tools that facilitate design and creation of bio-experimentation, and evaluation of experimental results through imaging tools will be developed to support activities spanning across the entire bioprinting process. Finally, bioreagent kits will be created to support consumable needs for the 3D bioprinter.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.