SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Cost Innovative Greener/Safer Process for Converting Cellulose to Glucose

Award identifier 55b686473e27a7ab1de08fb485a5dfbc32abfd4f51010d74ef74972a5751eba0Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$600,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
2016-09-01
Contract end date
2019-08-31
UEI
JDNRH32DML47
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
8.1

Research abstract

The current dependence of the United States on fossil fuels has sparked enormous interest in the development of biomaterials derived from biomass, specifically cellulosic biomaterials. Cellulosic biomaterials are a carbon neutral, renewable resource, and their use could drastically curtail total carbon dioxide emissions while also reducing U.S. dependence on fossil fuels. Biofuels is one example of biomaterials that can be derived from biomass. Worldwide biomass energy resources are estimated at 2 x 1021 J per year; this compares to the total worldwide energy reserve of about 2 x 1022 J stored in crude oil. Therefore, biomass grown over the course of a decade sequesters the energetic equivalent to the entire worldwide reserve of crude oil and represents an enormous reserve of energy that has yet to be significantly tapped. In addition, the United States itself has large reserves of cellulosic biomass, and it presents a potential route to energy independence.The Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) has identified a potentially attractive cellulose pretreatment process. Key to success of the CMS innovative pretreatment process is very high recovery of key starting materials. CMS has identified and provided preliminary data for successful membrane recovery of key starting materials. In Phase I CMS and JBEI demonstrated the pretreatment process and a novel membrane process for recovering the valuablekey starting materials. Using the basic datawe have quantified cost savings of CMS process being more than 60% relative to alternative process.CMS has put together a strong team of experts to demonstrate the CMS process. In Phase II we will scale up and optimize the CMS system and build a pilot test system to demonstrate the concept at larger scale. Using the pilot scale data we will conduct an engineering and economic analysis to highlight the economic advantage of the proposed concept vs. conventional technologies. This research and development project, if successful, will not only lead to a non-fossil fuel source of less-costly bio-fuels, but will also provide apractical routeto high value bio-chemicals. We expect alarge commercialization potential with this project.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

218 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2021). Reported award amounts total $55,705,610. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.