SBIR/STTR Research Award

Segmented In Vitro Translation for Expanding Peptide Library Diversity

Award identifier 07eca73751b55a29f4eace4f14e6d4200c5ee123918a7e7f7d6260d9aec56652Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$348,848

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Onca Bio, Inc.
Proposal award date
2025-09-15
Contract end date
2026-09-14
UEI
V8VCVK9FA4Y8
Solicitation number
PA24-245
Topic code
100

Research abstract

mRNA display is a method of rapidly generating large protein-peptide binding datasets and discovering de novo peptide therapeutics. In particular, mRNA display has been the starting point for discovering several macrocyclic peptide drugs addressing a variety of conditions: cholesterol management (MK-0616, Phase III trials), cancer radiotherapy (RYZ101, Phase III), and myasthenia gravis (Zilucoplan, approved). Yet these compounds all took years of additional screening to advance from mRNA display hit to a lead compound. Creating more productive mRNA libraries that yield lead-ready hits would be of great interest for drug discovery practitioners and patients. One key limitation of current mRNA display macrocycle libraries derives from the method of synthesis. The precursor peptides are synthesized with two fixed residues, a chloroacetyl and a thiol amino acid, that spontaneously react to form cycles. However, this results in libraries with zero diversity at two positions, and therefore suboptimal hits that necessarily contain these two residues. Although variants can be manually synthesized and tested post-selection, any synergistic effects with other ring elements cannot be recovered. Onca Bio proposes to diversify these cyclization positions, leading to binding hits that utilize all residues, as well as more complete structure-activity-relationship datasets for use in any optimization work that is needed. The work will leverage a new approach, Segmented In Vitro Translation (SIVT), that allows more flexibility to install non-natural amino acids, including those that drive cyclization. SIVT can reassign mRNA codons to different amino acids multiple times within a single transcript sequence; i.e., the codon table is defined locally by position, rather than globally across the entire sequence. SIVT has been demonstrated in single sequences, but applying it in the context of ultra large libraries will require fundamental technology development in both the methodology of SIVT, the design of the mRNA libraries, and the non-natural substrates used. If successful, the resulting mRNA display libraries will contain diversity at every amino acid position including the cyclization residues, and boost the overall chemical space coverage by an order of magnitude. The ultimate measure of library productivity will be testing the libraries in mRNA display selections against “undruggable” targets and benchmarking against typical mRNA display macrocycle libraries. Successful execution of this SBIR phase one effort will allow Onca to commercialize SIVT-based mRNA display for peptide discovery. Proprietary information – Onca Bio, Inc.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.