SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid Response Agents Against Filovirus Outbreaks Using Vectored Immunoprophylaxis

Award identifier 7c01a6ec29c7bdcb4d5386cee785e36bef3b25ab049ae810a7a237aa10346571Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$240,221

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
MAPP BIOPHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2016-08-01
Contract end date
2017-04-30
UEI
M9V9QTHR1H28
Solicitation number
PA15-269
Topic code
NIAID

Research abstract

Summarty Abstract Vectored immunoprophylaxis or antibody gene transfer for infectious disease is a promising new strategy to provide protection against high risk infectious agents supplementing vaccine and passive immunization efforts It has been demonstrated to be effective against HIV and Dengue virus in animal models and there is currently an ongoing human trial for HIV prevention in high risk individuals with an adeno associated viral vector AAV delivering the gene for a broadly neutralizing HIV antibody We propose to expand these efforts to the filoviruses starting with the Ebolavirus Zaire EBOV EBOV causes severe hemorrhagic fever with a high mortality between and depending on the virus Although the recent EBOV epidemic appears to be waning the outbreak was classified by the WHO as andquot an international public health emergency andquot In addition Ebolavirus is a potential bioterrorism agent Category A While recent reports suggest optimism for an Ebola vaccine these are early trials with much work to be done to prove efficacy and to characterize the onset of protection and durability Passive immunization has shown great promise against EBOV in a therapeutic setting however production capabilities are not yet available for protection of a large segment of the population and passive immunization requires repeated administration if used in a prophylactic setting As such there is an ongoing need for increasing the repertoire of immunoprotectants such as vectored antibodies Project Narrative We will use mAb G gene transfer to compare the expression patterns from both AAV and plasmid based systems and to assess efficacy in a live virus challenge model in mice compared to the native murine G mAb The results will provide the basis for a definitive investigation during which time the plasmid and AAV approaches will be evaluated head to head and in combination in non human primates

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

29 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $27,737,822. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Contractor profile

MAPP BIOPHARMACEUTICAL, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.