SBIR/STTR Research Award

Very Low Head Modular Turbine with Advanced Hydrodynamics and Power Takeoff

Award identifier 69d9599f156065d0d7655e7c3255ebc3dbab15abc20bc0585090a8a4b3ec328eAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,947

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Concepts NREC, LLC
Proposal award date
2016-06-13
Contract end date
2017-03-12
UEI
PKMJNWK4V2U1
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001417
Topic code
15

Research abstract

According to a 2014 study commissioned by the Department of Energy, hydropower from more than 3 million untapped streams in the United States could potentially generate 65 gigawatts of electricity and help to reduce greenhouse emissions and pollution. However, the development of hydropower has been limited by several obstacles, as described by the United States Geological Survey: most of the prime locations have already been developed, and the cost, time, and environmental impact of constructing conventional hydroelectric facilities at relatively low power levels are untenable. A low-cost, low- impact, high-performance hydropower turbine is needed to cost-effectively tap into the large amount of this available hydropower. The proposed work will create a low-cost, modular, and very low-head hydroelectric turbine generator unit. This unit will have a small footprint and a reduced environmental impact, and will function in a broad range of operating conditions. By focusing on very low-head applications, many of the issues of free-stream power generation can be avoided while still keeping the site impact and footprint low. Several design technologies (hydrodynamic and structural) can be applied to a small, very low-head hydro turbine to address issues of cost, durability, installation, and performance. Phase I tasks include: • Conducting a study to determine optimum turbine sizing to best utilize the modular stackable nature of the design and accommodate a broad range of installation parameters. • Carrying out a hydrodynamic design study to develop and optimize the axial turbine geometry for low-head applications—including the ability to scale or to stack units to cover a range of flows and heads. • Creating a mechanical design of the turbine generator system, and working to realize the mechanical design benefits described above by incorporating novel drive techniques. • Developing a production cost model for the turbine generator unit that factors in the impact of low-cost manufacturing techniques. If this project is carried over into Phase II or Phase III, the commercial applications are extensive. There are a very large number of existing sites inside and outside the United States where this technology can be applied immediately. Key Words: Hydro, hydro turbine, hydroelectric

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

68 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2024). Reported award amounts total $20,616,344. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.