SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improving Efficiency and Reducing Costs for the Supercritical C02 Design Process

Award identifier ca527df0ae626fc8f5caf2fe7d5500aa2bb64a2c9ff5be48f7937eecf6dc4f6cAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,947

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Concepts NREC, LLC
Proposal award date
2016-06-13
Contract end date
2018-12-12
UEI
PKMJNWK4V2U1
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001417
Topic code
18

Research abstract

Supercritical CO2 cycles have the potential to significantly improve efficiency and reduce emissions in power generation. However, the unique fluid dynamic properties of supercritical CO2 that enable these higher efficiencies also complicate the design and layout of the system, particularly its turbomachinery components. The problem stems specifically from the highly non-linear properties of CO2, which pose significant difficulties in modeling. Commercial software companies have been slow to respond to this issue, resulting in a critical unmet market need. The objective of this Phase I effort is to create a comprehensive set of computational software tools that can accurately predict the performance of compressors, pumps and turbines when operating with supercritical CO2. To reduce the scope and complexity of this effort, the specific developments needed for supercritical CO2 will be built on a foundation of existing software tool sets, already developed for turbomachinery design. Once these models have been comprehensively upgraded for the specific demands required, a complete and fully functional system for the confident design of turbomachinery components for supercritical CO2 applications will be realized. Phase I tasks include: The improvement of thermodynamic calculations for the unique demands of supercritical CO2 and its efficient application in computational fluid dynamic analysis. A comprehensive study of how to stabilize the solution process in the existing solver, with recommendations for schematic changes required in Phase II. Development of recommendations to improve turbulence models for non-linear fluid properties, such as supercritical CO2. Development of post-processing functions that can determine the need for nucleation modeling and solution reliability. Recommendations for a suitable nucleation model based on the initial results from Phase I. If this project is carried over into Phase II or Phase III, the commercial applications are extensive. The software would be applicable to many different supercritical CO2 power cycle scenarios, and it will encourage energy saving in other areas where efficient turbomachinery design with real fluid thermodynamic properties is required. Key Words: supercritical, CO2, compressor, power

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

68 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2024). Reported award amounts total $20,616,344. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.