SBIR/STTR Research Award

SHM Technology for Space Applications

Award identifier 00e7c5ab1e626a220c87f810dc6383ad5e91dec09e010767e93bb609486d101fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
METIS DESIGN CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2016-05-27
Contract end date
2017-04-03
UEI
CKDFRHKKRNY3
Solicitation number
2016.1
Topic code
AF161-095

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: SHM hardware is needed to meet AFSPC needs for resilient bus technologies.All components attached to space systems are required to be securely fastened in order to provide a good thermal conduction path, and ensure they will not become a hazardous projectile during launch. This requirement is enforced through a limited number of periodic manual spot checks on fasteners, and typically a single mechanical (shock and vibration) and environmental (temperature under vacuum) checkout. This however, leaves a lot of opportunity for the system to change unexpectedly and inadvertently during other periods of the life-cycle. There is also no current capability to do this inspection during or post launch. The MD7-Pro system provides a self-contained, comprehensive guided wave inspection capability. This hardware will be able to be used for an automated, remote, on-demand checks for loosened fasteners and thermal gaps anywhere in a space structure, without disassembly, even in inaccessible locations. During the proposed work, MDC will work to determine an optimal configuration to minimize SWaP for a representative satellite structure, conduct a trade study on risk reducing approaches for surviving space environment and finally produce a small-scale demonstration using embedded algorithms to detect degree of faster loosening.; BENEFIT: Once successfully demonstrated through a Phase II effort, there exists a broad commercial market for this SHM method.One of the key success factors for this technology is its versatility; the ability not only to be integrated into new applications, but to be retrofitted into an existing asset designs. Initial relevant markets would include space applications, but the technology could easily proliferate into any DoD asset, ranging from fixed wing to rotorcraft to ships and ground vehicles, to aid in condition based maintenance. Once demonstrated in defense applications, comparable commercial opportunities exist, particularly for aircraft and potentially buildings and civil infrastructure once the production cost has been driven low enough.MDC will work through strategic partners to license the technology for production and deployment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

64 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $32,532,312. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.