SBIR/STTR Research Award

Expandable Proppants for In-Situ Well Stimulation

Award identifier 06c64594ba3f1888f4830c5e44da38229fe83288a3fff843da7696bc48ad7e82Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$995,797

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TERVES, LLC
Proposal award date
2016-04-11
Contract end date
2018-04-10
UEI
NJGYMQDJBBD7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001405
Topic code
16b

Research abstract

The exploitation and recovery of gas from unconventional formations, such as shale are changing the United States from a net energy importer to potentially an exporter due to the economics of hydraulic stimulation to enhance oil recovery. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Analysis, over 33 million barrels of oil and 1,480 trillion cubic feet of natural gas are technically recoverable from tight and shale formations in the United States. Currently, Oil recovery rates are less than 7% on average, while gas recovery rates remain around 25% of total recoverable reserves. Furthermore, currently, hydraulic stimulation processes utilize large amounts of water, which must be treated and disposed of during flowback. How Problem is Being Addressed This Phase I SBIR will develop engineered stimulation fluid alternatives and modifications to slickwater fluids that provide the controlled application of force independent of flowrate to widen and extend fracture networks. The ability to stimulate with higher degrees of control and expand fracture networks that are not in the primary tensile direction (eg, shear fractures). The addition of materials that expand the fluid volume in-situ during completion is the approach being taken Actions of Phase I The phase I program will characterize the underlying kinetics and effectiveness of the novel stimulation fluids, and will experimentally determine the engineering design basis for their use. Methods of controlling the rate and under what conditions (timing) the expansion force is delivered into crack networks will be experimentally verified, and their function and resultant fracture conductivity after stimulation will be measured using API reference methods in the laboratory to demonstrate feasibility and support transition to scale-up and field trials. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits This program will develop unconventional stimulation fluids that have improved control over crack widening and extension compared to current fluids used in the oil and gas industry. This ability to produce improved fracture network conductivity with lower water use can potentially increase oil recovery by 20-40%, and are also applicable to the development of the 200,000 exojoule enhanced geothermal energy sources available in North America.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

20 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2024). Reported award amounts total $7,162,880. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.