SBIR/STTR Research Award

SAGES II: System Acquisition Guidance from Expert Systems

Award identifier 95493d34afc87e720864b674ba2110a4e959b38a334525adceda1960b9c3a4fbAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,142,416

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
APTIMA INC
Proposal award date
2015-09-25
Contract end date
2015-12-01
UEI
K1GCPNNZKEN7
Solicitation number
2011.2
Topic code
AF112-019

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:The high costs and inherent dangers of live training with air platforms have motivated the increasing use of simulation-based training. However, selecting a system to effectively meet training objectives can be challenging, particularly one that must blend multiple disparate technologies. Among these challenges is the need to acquire visual display systems that optimally support training objectives. To support this need, Aptima, Inc., proposes to develop a prototype Decision Support System (DSS) known as SAGES (System Acquisition Guidance from Expert Systems), a model-based solution intended to provide insight into the relationships between visual display attributes and training objectives. The SAGES system will include tools to characterize visual display systems, specify training objectives, and explore the tradeoffs for how well a system meets a set of training objectives compared to another system. An expert system will be at the center of this solution to analyze and prioritize systems based on a data-driven model.BENEFIT:The SAGES system will offer extensive benefits to both acquisition professionals and training communities. Acquisition professionals will be able to make informed decisions on the tradeoffs of visual display system purchases with minimal time and effort, which both facilitates optimal training and maximizes the impact of dollars spent on simulation-based training equipment. Training communities will be able to better understand existing training technology to improve the success rates for meeting training objectives. Furthermore, the commercial applications for SAGES are promising. All sectors of the Department of Defense rely on virtual environments for air platform training, and must carefully select visual display technology to meet training objectives. A similar application for SAGES can benefit the commercial aviation industry as it addresses the impact of HR5900 Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010. Finally, the medical simulation market, which also requires high visual fidelity for effective training, continues to grow and thus requires support in determining visual display technologies to meeting training objectives.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

520 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2025). Reported award amounts total $208,057,185. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.