SBIR/STTR Research Award

Integration of a Guided Wave-based Damage Detection System for the C-5 Aircraft

Award identifier 8105f7fcd352d15c5e8472a9a4ae630cfbf48e90e413d6a312df031e16815170Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,495,302

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
METIS DESIGN CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2015-09-21
Contract end date
2017-09-20
UEI
CKDFRHKKRNY3
Solicitation number
2003.3
Topic code
AF03T017

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:This proposal presents tasks leading to an integrated flight test of a structural health monitoring (SHM) system to monitor damage in the C-5 aircraft material with minimal manual intervention. During Phase I, MDC focused on the design of a sensor hardware for SHM that makes use of a distributed infrastructure. The original Phase II effort focused on the fabrication and testing of a prototype of this SHM infrastructure. During this Phase II extension, MDC seeks to mature, integrate and test this SHM system on the C-5. Tasks will focus on sensor placement optimization, algorithm calibration for these locations, a probability of detection assessment, airworthiness assessment, and an integration exercise. This work will follow the appropriate MIL standards, including 810G, 461G and 1823A. Finally, the program will end in an integrated flight test demonstration to include multiple different sensing technologies and a ground station with user interface. The goal of the project is to be in a position to be able to conform to ASIP standards at the conclusion to be used as an alternative means of compliance for conventional NDI methods.BENEFIT:Once successfully demonstrated through a Phase II effort, there exists a broad commercial market for this SHM method. One of the key success factors for this technology is its versatility; the ability not only to be integrated into new applications, but to be retrofitted into an existing asset designs. The continuum crack gauge could be applied to composite or metallic structure, be used to find new damage, track existing damage growth, or be applied as part of a bonded repair to check effectiveness in crack arrest. Initial relevant markets would include DoD fixed-wing aircraft, but the technology could easily proliferate into any DoD asset, ranging from rotorcraft to ships and ground vehicles, to aid in condition based maintenance. Once demonstrated in defense applications, comparable commercial opportunities exist, particularly for aircraft and potentially buildings and civil infrastructure once the production cost has been driven low enough. MDC will work through strategic partners to license the technology for production and deployment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

64 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $32,532,312. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.