SBIR/STTR Research Award

Micro Variable In-flight Simulation Test Aircraft

Award identifier 69208bdac6c4991a72f37c6fa09bfae1169e256c67332e3a7b5026e1ea5cca83Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,397,346

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
BOLDER FLIGHT SYSTEMS INC
Proposal award date
2025-09-10
Contract end date
2027-09-14
UEI
EJHETYKGGGN5
Solicitation number
25.1
Topic code
AF251-D004

Research abstract

Flight research and validation in a relevant environment is a critical element in the maturation of aeronautics technology. Developing, instrumenting, and validating test vehicles to support flight research is a cost and time intensive process and typically reserved for late-stage research and development. Given the complexity of autonomous systems and the wide range of target vehicles and environments they will be operated within, it is cost and time prohibitive to flight validate all of these scenarios using target platforms. Model Following Algorithms (MFA) can enable a surrogate research aircraft to simulate the dynamics of target aircraft through a control augmentation process. Multiple target vehicles can be simulated in this process, enabling rapid and low-cost flight validation of software and autonomy algorithms and promoting early-stage flight research. The X-62 Variable In-flight Simulation Test Aircraft (VISTA) demonstrated the value of this approach using a F-16 surrogate vehicle. So far, autonomy tests on small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) surrogate platforms have all used either waypoint or Heading-Speed-Altitude (HSA) commands. Lower-Level Controls (LLC) are necessary to test more performant and complex autonomy algorithms, including Beyond-Visual-Range (BVR) flight and Basic Fighter Maneuvers (BFM). While LLC interfaces on X-62 VISTA enable acceleration and rate command inputs to the F-16, no such interface exists for sUAS surrogate vehicles. Our team, comprised of Bolder Flight Systems Inc. (BFS), Systems Technology Inc. (STI), and Thorondor LLC, proposes to develop, test, and validate a micro Variable In-flight Simulation Test Aircraft (uVISTA); a FLight Control System (FLCS) architecture that will enable a sUAS surrogate vehicle to use MFA to simulate the state dynamics and responses of a target vehicle. uVISTA will define an LLC interface and provide envelope protection and automated recovery from state-limit exceedance. uVISTA will be integrated with the Carbon Cub and Renegade sUAS. Accurate models of these platforms will be developed and the MFA demonstrated using LLC from an autonomy processor. Envelope protection and automated recovery from state limit exceedance will also be demonstrated in flight. Both aircraft will be delivered upon completion of the period of performance along with the integrated uVISTA FLCS; flight data and models; integration and operation manuals; and interim and final reports.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2025). Reported award amounts total $3,453,410. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.