SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: Reactive Silver Inks for High Performance Printed Electronics

Award identifier 875b367797bce77ffd074d9e10eeff04ec8ce744253aff87a9cc1bae813463ceAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$709,027

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ELECTRONINKS INCORPORATED
Proposal award date
2015-08-28
Contract end date
2017-08-31
UEI
C1NGHPR66AY5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
NM

Research abstract

The broader impact/commercial potential of this Small Business Innovation Research Phase II project will be to greatly enhance the capabilities of printed electronics via high performance conductive materials. This will be accomplished by the development and commercialization of novel silver and copper ink chemistries that are used in a number of device applications ranging from display bezels and interconnects, to high performance OLED electrodes, to ink specifically developed for high speed printing and smart packaging applications. The commercial impact of such developments will be the significant adoption and use of printed electronics material palettes across multiple consumer electronic device platforms. This will ultimately lead to more efficient device manufacture with a simultaneous improvement in performance. The printed electronics market is rapidly growing with progress hinging on fundamental material improvements. The objectives of this Phase II research project are to demonstrate scalability of reactive silver ink chemistries, formulations for productization standards, and development of reactive copper ink chemistries. The reactive silver ink chemistry has begun to receive significant traction with customers. This program plans to achieve scalability of this high performance ink by novel purification of silver salts to achieve a high conductivity at large scales with industrially relevant processes. Next the inks will need to adhere to specific productization standards. This includes modifications of the chemistry for various printing processes ranging from low viscosity (10 cPs) up to high viscosities for high-volume printing techniques (1000 cPs and higher). Also, modifications to the chemistry for various testing criteria such as adhesion, abrasion, and environmental tests such as humidity and heat cycling will be made. Finally, reactive copper chemistries will be further developed. Copper inks that can be processed thermally in the ambient environment represent both a significant challenge as well as a vast opportunity in the printed electronics market. We have developed novel chemistries based on various low molecular weight reducing agents and short-chain surfactants that both reduce the copper quickly under thermal cycling while protecting the surface from oxidation.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

21 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2025). Reported award amounts total $11,601,691. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.