SBIR/STTR Research Award

Calibrated Methods for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging Phase II

Award identifier 545ed7493b972939cbad459a19807eb81aba8e41f88d6144a6205280dd83024bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,468,003

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
KITWARE INC
Proposal award date
2015-08-01
Contract end date
2019-07-31
UEI
DK6LPWMS5LP5
Solicitation number
PA14-072
Topic code
102

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION provided by applicant The overall goal of this Phase II STTR proposal is to develop a PET CT imaging tool that will help accelerate the development of effective cancer therapies by improving the utility of oncology trials using PET imaging The growing cost time and complexity of clinical trials are driving patient and pharmaceutical company demand for more objective efficient and accurate methods to assess the efficacy of therapeutic agents PET CT imaging has the potential to provide a quantitative and early assessment of drug response at a molecular level However PET CT use as a biomarker and response endpoint in clinical trials is limited Key factors impeding the incorporation of PET into clinical trials are the considerable variability in imaging methods across centers the inconsistency in quantitative measures arising from different sites and the variable and non optimal methods for image analysis In our Phase I work we developed calibrated quantitative analysis tools that directly support improved quantitative accuracy in clinical trials using PET CT imaging We combined the CT andapos pocket phantomandapos developed by Kitware with a PET scanner calibration process developed at the University of Washington UW that is based on National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST traceable calibration sources We also extended our automated algorithms to detect and measure the phantom and calculate key PET image characteristics The Phase I proof of concept study achieved its specific aims and in this Phase II submission we will develop and implement the studies and tools needed to translate our proof of concept results to use with human imaging for clinical trials The end goal of the phase II project is to complete all necessary work to market PET CT calibration and measurement phantoms and analysis services PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE The goal of this project is to develop a PET CT andapos pocket phantomandapos and automated analysis software for patient specific PET CT image quality characterization which can significantly improve the accuracy of measurements in clinical trials of new cancer therapies

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

243 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $140,194,302. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.