SBIR/STTR Research Award

Inflatable Tracking Antenna - 2.4 Meter

Award identifier bdf641a766b249d5338a6a5877639e1ac6d39a4d96b19fdb626fcc95ed2a9d98Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,487,399

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Gatr Technologies, Inc.
Proposal award date
2015-07-23
Contract end date
2017-01-22
UEI
TNMNYWRNFDK9
Solicitation number
2004.1
Topic code
MDA04-088

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:This technology development effort focuses on introducing a prototype 2.4 meter aperture, deployable Satellite Communication (SATCOM) ground station. Over the past three years, a pathfinder GATR tracking ground station was fabricated and tested by tracking different satellites in low Earth orbit at multiple frequency bands (S, X, Ka). This Phase II SBIR effort focuses on maturing the tracker structure to meet the deployment dynamics and environmental rigors encountered in a military environment. All of the track stand hardware to include the base mount, the azimuth and elevation motors, and the outrigger arms will be re-designed to meet design objectives. The technical data package required for manufacturing will be generated in this program. This contract will also mature the components necessary for uplink and downlink at a single operating band. Feed and feedmounts will be designed, tested, and built to accommodate these uplink and downlink frequencies. An optimized tracking algorithm for the ground station will be designed, ensuring the control system provides accurate pointing of the inflatable antenna. The tracking software interface will allow users to task the antenna for tracking. Packaging will be optimized for human factors (weight, dimensions, center of mass) and environmental (I.e., temperature, shock, and vibration) considerations.BENEFIT:The Cubesat community has been focusing on developing smaller and cheaper satellites and less costly launch options. However, as the number of communications and data gathering satellites in low and medium earth orbit increases, the need for satellite tracking ground terminals is increasing as well. Over the next 5 years, the need to track and downlink payload data from LEO/MEO satellites will far outstrip the capabilities of current ground stations. Most satellite tracking ground stations are in fixed locations on concrete pads, and are not transportable. Those satellite tracking ground stations that are transportable are large, bulky, trailer-mounted, and therefore expensive to transport. The revolutionary GATR deployable 2.4 meter tracking antenna can be shipped anywhere in the world via standard mail options (i.e., FEDEX) or as checkable baggage on commercial airlines. The GATR tracking antenna can be further transported by SUV to remote locations and be operational within an hour.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2015). Reported award amounts total $10,249,231. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.