SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-Cost, Portable, Point of Care Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography (aEEG)

Award identifier 7f57f2ef699c9d8f3adc07032cfa072768a9969490f15e406a4e5e85b257ef9eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$224,573

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ADVANCED MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CORP
Proposal award date
2015-07-01
Contract end date
2016-06-30
UEI
GJ1KBJPEZL52
Solicitation number
HD15-006
Topic code
NICHD

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION provided by applicant The goal of this project is to develop a portable low cost tool to aid in the diagnosis intervention and improvement of outcomes for neonates born with neurologic complications The project will develop instrumentation technology to enable early detection of neurologic brain injury and seizure activity for newborns delivered in care facilities that lack a full suite of neurological diagnostic tools In neonates with birth asphyxia seizures are very common and most frequently subclinical Many studies have observed that even experienced clinicians have difficulty correctly identifying seizures in this population Subsequently clinical paroxysms that do not truly represent seizure are frequently over treated and subclinical seizures including status epilepticus go unrecognized and untreated As such the use of continuous video electroencephalograph EEG monitoring is the gold standard for recognizing and treating seizures in this population It is also very helpful at identifying which children have sustained brain injury including hypoxia This resource intense modality has become the standard of care at many tertiary medical centers but unfortunately remains unavailable to many clinicians at smaller birth facilities Quantitative EEG including the use of amplitude integrated EEG aEEG has gained widespread use at most neonatal ICUs and represents a more user friendly bedside tool for identifying brain injury and seizures The goal of the phase I project is to specify design prototype and evaluate a low cost telemedicine enabled aEEG monitor that is portable and supports widespread use in smaller facilities A prototype instrument will be specified designed built and evaluated The follow on phase II program will conduct a large human trial PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE The project will develop technology to aid in the diagnosis intervention and improvement of outcomes for neonates born with neurologic complications

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

138 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2024). Reported award amounts total $61,745,451. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.